Suppr超能文献

与冠状动脉旁路移植术相比,药物洗脱支架会增加严重晚期不良事件的发生率:令人担忧的原因。

Increased incidence of serious late adverse events with drug-eluting stents when compared with coronary artery bypass surgery: a cause of concern.

机构信息

Cardiac Unit Otamendi Hospital Cardiovascular Research Center (CECI) Azcuenaga 870, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

Future Cardiol. 2020 Nov;16(6):711-723. doi: 10.2217/fca-2020-0033. Epub 2020 Jul 9.

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) in pre-drug-eluting stents (DESs) era, randomized trials and meta-analysis showed that the extension of coronary artery disease was not associated with a better survival with CABG, and only diabetic patients had an inferior survival with PCI. After the introduction of DES, we would expect a substantial improvement in PCI results compared with CABG, narrowing the gap between both revascularization strategies, However, on the contrary, most randomized studies between DES and CABG showed that rate of recurrences remained and there is an unexpected increased of late serious adverse events including spontaneous myocardial infarction and death. In this review, we try to described each of these problems and find out explanations for these new findings searching for potential solutions.

摘要

在药物洗脱支架(DES)出现之前,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的随机试验和荟萃分析表明,冠状动脉疾病的延伸与 CABG 的更好生存无关,只有糖尿病患者的 PCI 生存率较低。DES 引入后,我们预计与 CABG 相比,PCI 结果会有实质性改善,缩小两种血运重建策略之间的差距。然而,相反,DES 和 CABG 之间的大多数随机研究表明,复发率仍然存在,并且出乎意料地增加了晚期严重不良事件,包括自发性心肌梗死和死亡。在这篇综述中,我们试图描述这些问题中的每一个,并找出这些新发现的解释,寻找潜在的解决方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验