Engineering Design, FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany.
Ergonomics. 2020 Nov;63(11):1442-1458. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2020.1786606. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
Digital human models (DHM) allow for a proactive ergonomic assessment of products by applying different models describing the user-product interaction. In engineering design, DHM tools are currently not established as computer-aided ergonomics tools, since (among other reasons) the interaction models are either cumbersome to use, unstandardised, time-demanding or not trustworthy. To understand the challenges in interaction modelling, we conducted a systematic literature review with the aim of identification, classification and examination of existing interaction models. A schematic user-product interaction model for DHM is proposed, abstracting existing models and unifying the corresponding terminology. Additionally, nine general approaches to proactive interaction modelling were identified by classifying the reviewed interaction models. The approaches are discussed regarding their scope, limitations, strength and weaknesses. Ultimately, the literature review revealed that prevalent interaction models cannot be considered unconditionally suitable for engineering design since none of them offer a satisfactory combination of genuine proactivity and universal validity. This contribution presents a systematic literature review conducted to identify, classify and examine existing proactive interaction modelling approaches for digital human models in engineering design. Ultimately, the literature review revealed that prevalent interaction models cannot be considered unconditionally suitable for engineering design since none of them offer a satisfactory combination of genuine proactivity and universal validity. DHM: digital human model; CAE: computer-aided engineering; RQ: research question.
数字人体模型 (DHM) 通过应用描述用户-产品交互的不同模型,允许对产品进行主动的人机工程学评估。在工程设计中,DHM 工具目前尚未作为计算机辅助人机工程学工具确立,这是因为(除其他原因外)交互模型使用起来繁琐、不标准、耗时或不可靠。为了了解交互建模中的挑战,我们进行了一项系统的文献回顾,旨在识别、分类和检查现有的交互模型。提出了一种用于 DHM 的示意性用户-产品交互模型,该模型抽象了现有模型并统一了相应的术语。此外,通过对回顾的交互模型进行分类,确定了九种主动交互建模的一般方法。讨论了这些方法在其范围、局限性、优势和劣势方面的情况。最终,文献综述表明,流行的交互模型不能被无条件地认为适用于工程设计,因为它们都没有提供真正的主动性和普遍有效性的令人满意的组合。本文贡献了一项系统的文献综述,旨在识别、分类和检查工程设计中数字人体模型的现有主动交互建模方法。最终,文献综述表明,流行的交互模型不能被无条件地认为适用于工程设计,因为它们都没有提供真正的主动性和普遍有效性的令人满意的组合。DHM:数字人体模型;CAE:计算机辅助工程;RQ:研究问题。