Department of Orthopaedics, Prisma Health-Upstate, Greenville, SC, USA.
The HSS Sports Medicine Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jul;29(7S):S59-S66. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.04.003.
Instability arthropathy is a known cause of glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA) among patients with and without prior shoulder stabilization. This study aims to compare the clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) scores among total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) patients with and without a history of shoulder stabilization.
A case-control study was performed comparing 20 patients with a history of anterior shoulder stabilization (11 open, 9 arthroscopic) who underwent TSA to a matched cohort of 20 TSA patients without a history of shoulder surgery (mean follow-up = 2.8 years). Patients were matched by sex, age, and baseline American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score within 10 points (mean age 59.6 ± 9.6 years). Patient characteristics, operative findings, and preoperative and postoperative radiographic characteristics for both groups were reported. Comparisons were made regarding PROM scores (ASES, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), Shoulder Activity Scale [SAS], numeric rating scale for pain) at baseline, 2 years, and 5 years and patient satisfaction at 2 years.
Intraoperative findings of subscapularis scarring or attenuation was common among patients with prior anterior stabilization. The instability cohort did have a higher percentage of B2/B3 glenoid types than the OA cohort (45% vs. 15%), but this was not significantly different possibly because of the small sample size. At 2 years, both instability and OA groups reported significant improvement in pain, function, and activity level. There was no difference between groups on any PROMs or patient satisfaction level. At 5 years, instability patients had significantly lower scores on the ASES and the SF-12 PCS than the OA group.
There was notable alterations in both soft tissue and bony morphology among patients with prior anterior stabilization. After TSA, both instability and primary OA groups showed significant improvements at 2 years. However, PROMs for instability patients deteriorated at 5 years compared with the control group. Complex bony and soft tissue imbalances may contribute to more unpredictable long-term PROM scores. Thoughtful preoperative consideration of these factors should influence decision making regarding selection of TSA for management of OA in this complex patient cohort.
不稳定关节病是导致肩袖稳定术前后患者出现肩肱关节炎(OA)的已知原因。本研究旨在比较有和无肩袖稳定术史的全肩关节置换术(TSA)患者的临床、影像学和患者报告的结局测量(PROM)评分。
对 20 例有前肩稳定术史(11 例开放,9 例关节镜)的患者进行了病例对照研究,这些患者接受了 TSA,并与 20 例无肩袖手术史的 TSA 患者相匹配(平均随访时间=2.8 年)。患者通过性别、年龄和基线美国肩肘外科医师协会标准化肩部评估表(ASES)评分在 10 分以内进行匹配(平均年龄 59.6±9.6 岁)。报告了两组患者的特征、手术结果以及术前和术后影像学特征。比较了两组患者的 PROM 评分(ASES、12 项简短健康调查(SF-12)、肩部活动量表(SAS)、疼痛数字评分量表),以及两组患者在 2 年和 5 年的患者满意度。
有前肩稳定术史的患者中,肩胛下肌的疤痕或萎缩的术中发现很常见。不稳定组的 B2/B3 型肩胛盂比例高于 OA 组(45%比 15%),但由于样本量小,差异无统计学意义。2 年时,不稳定组和 OA 组的疼痛、功能和活动水平均有显著改善。两组在任何 PROM 或患者满意度方面均无差异。5 年时,不稳定组患者的 ASES 和 SF-12 PCS 评分明显低于 OA 组。
有前肩稳定术史的患者的软组织和骨形态均有明显改变。接受 TSA 后,不稳定组和原发性 OA 组在 2 年时均有显著改善。然而,与对照组相比,不稳定组患者的 PROM 在 5 年后恶化。复杂的骨和软组织失衡可能导致更不可预测的长期 PROM 评分。在为这类复杂患者选择 TSA 治疗 OA 时,术前应仔细考虑这些因素,以影响决策。