Shrestha Prajowl, Madan Karan, Hadda Vijay, Upadhyay Ashish, Mittal Saurabh, Tiwari Pawan, Pandey R M, Garg Rakesh, Khilnani G C, Guleria Randeep, Mohan Anant
Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Department of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Lung India. 2020 Jul-Aug;37(4):295-299. doi: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_476_19.
Central airway obstruction (CAO) is a potentially lethal condition that requires urgent endobronchial intervention and may occur due to several nonmalignant causes. The effect of these interventions on clinically relevant outcomes such as symptomatic and functional status over a period of time is, however, sparsely studied.
Consecutive patients with CAO due to nonmalignant causes and undergoing various therapeutic bronchoscopy procedures were evaluated. Symptoms were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Speiser score, and functional status was assessed using the 6-min walk test, spirometry, and St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score at baseline and after 48 h, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks postprocedure.
Over 2 years, 31 patients with CAO due to nonmalignant etiology underwent 41 therapeutic bronchoscopic procedures. Majority of procedures (96.8%) were done using the rigid bronchoscope under general anesthesia. Postintubation tracheal stenosis was the most common indication (32.2%). The various procedures included, controlled radial expansion balloon dilatation of the stenotic airway (53.6%), deployment of silicone stents (19.5%), and mechanical debulking of airway tumors (16.1%). Significant improvement occurred in dyspnea and cough scores and in the Speiser score from baseline to 48 h postprocedure, and further improved at 4 weeks and 12 weeks. Similarly, the 6 min walk distance, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, and SGRQ scores progressively improved from baseline to 12 weeks. Complications occurred in 26.8% of total procedures, with no procedure-related mortality.
Therapeutic bronchoscopy interventions provide rapid and sustained benefits in symptoms and functional status of participants with CAO of nonmalignant etiology, with an acceptable safety profile.
中央气道梗阻(CAO)是一种潜在的致命疾病,需要紧急进行支气管内干预,且可能由多种非恶性原因引起。然而,这些干预措施对一段时间内症状和功能状态等临床相关结局的影响研究较少。
对因非恶性原因导致CAO并接受各种治疗性支气管镜检查的连续患者进行评估。在基线以及术后48小时、4周和12周时,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和斯皮泽评分评估症状,使用6分钟步行试验、肺功能测定和圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)评分评估功能状态。
在2年多的时间里,31例因非恶性病因导致CAO的患者接受了41次治疗性支气管镜检查。大多数检查(96.8%)是在全身麻醉下使用硬支气管镜进行的。插管后气管狭窄是最常见的适应症(32.2%)。各种检查包括对狭窄气道进行可控径向扩张球囊扩张(53.6%)、放置硅酮支架(19.5%)以及对气道肿瘤进行机械减容(16.1%)。从基线到术后48小时,呼吸困难和咳嗽评分以及斯皮泽评分有显著改善,并在4周和12周时进一步改善。同样,6分钟步行距离、第1秒用力呼气量和SGRQ评分从基线到12周逐渐改善。并发症发生率为总检查次数的26.8%,无与检查相关的死亡病例。
治疗性支气管镜检查干预能为非恶性病因导致CAO的参与者的症状和功能状态带来快速且持续的改善,安全性可接受。