Korb Diane, Schmitz Thomas, Seco Aurélien, Le Ray Camille, Santulli Pietro, Goffinet François, Deneux-Tharaux Catherine
Centre for Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité (CRESS), Université de Paris, Obstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team, EPOPé, INSERM, INRA, Paris, France.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Robert Debré Hospital, APHP, Paris, France.
Hum Reprod. 2020 Aug 1;35(8):1922-1932. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa108.
Is there a difference in the risk of serious maternal complications during pregnancy and the postpartum in twin pregnancies according to mode of conception: natural conception, non-IVF fertility treatment, IVF, ICSI or oocyte donation?
Women with twin pregnancies after medically assisted reproduction (MAR) had an overall risk of serious maternal complications 30% higher compared with women with natural twin pregnancies, and this association varied according to the MAR procedure; the risk was increased by 50% with IVF using autologous oocytes and by 270% with oocyte donation.
IVF has been reported as a risk factor for serious maternal complications in several concordant studies of singleton pregnancies. For twin pregnancies, this association is less well documented with imprecise categorisation of the mode of conception, and results are contradictory.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a secondary analysis of the national, observational, prospective, population-based cohort study of twin pregnancies (JUmeaux Mode d'Accouchement), which took place in France from 10 February 2014 through 1 March 2015. All French maternity units performing more than 1500 annual deliveries were invited to participate, regardless of their academic, public or private status or level of care. Of the 191 eligible units, 176 (92%) participated.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Women with a twin pregnancy who gave birth at or after 22 weeks of gestation were eligible (N = 8823 women included). We excluded women whose mode of conception was unknown (n = 75). Serious maternal complications were regrouped within the recently emerged concept of severe acute maternal morbidity (SAMM), as a binary composite outcome. The exposure of interest was the mode of conception, studied in five classes: natural conception (reference group), non-IVF fertility treatment including insemination and ovarian stimulation, IVF with autologous oocyte, ICSI with autologous oocyte and oocyte donation. To assess the association between the mode of conception and SAMM, we used multivariate logistic regression to adjust for confounders. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was used to explore the contribution to this association of potential intermediate factors, i.e. factors possibly caused by the mode of conception and responsible for SAMM: non-severe pre-eclampsia, placenta praevia and planned mode of delivery.
Among the 8748 women of the study population, 5890 (67.3%) conceived naturally, 854 (9.8%) had non-IVF fertility treatment, 1307 (14.9%) had IVF with autologous oocytes, 368 (4.2%) had ICSI with autologous oocytes and 329 (3.8%) used oocyte donation. Overall, 538 (6.1%) developed SAMM. Women with twin pregnancy after any type of MAR had a higher risk of SAMM than those with a natural twin pregnancy, after adjustment for confounders (7.9% (227/2858) compared to 5.3% (311/5890), adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.6). This association varied according to the MAR procedure. The risk of SAMM was higher among women with IVF using either autologous oocytes (8.3%; 108/1307) or oocyte donation (14.0%; 46/329) compared with the reference group (respectively aOR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-1.9 and aOR 2.7, 95% CI 1.8-4.1) and higher after oocyte donation compared with autologous oocytes (aOR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.6). Conversely, the risk of SAMM for women with non-IVF fertility treatment (6.2%; 53/854) and with ICSI using autologous oocytes (5.4%; 20/368) did not differ from that of the reference group (5.3%; 311/5890) (respectively aOR 1.1, 95% CI 0.8-1.5 and aOR 0.9, 95% CI 0.6-1.5). The tested intermediate factors poorly explained these increased risks.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Beyond the confounders and intermediate factors considered in our analysis, specific causes of infertility and specific aspects of infertility treatments may explain the differences in the risk of SAMM by mode of conception. However, these data were not available.
Our study showed an increased risk of SAMM in women with twin pregnancies after MAR, notably after IVF using autologous oocytes and particularly after oocyte donation. To avoid unnecessary exposure to the high-risk combination of MAR and multiple pregnancies, transfer of a single embryo should be encouraged whenever possible. Knowledge of these differential risks may inform discussions between clinicians and women about the mode of conception and help to optimise obstetric care for women in subgroups at higher risk.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by a grant from the French Ministry of Health (Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique, AOM2012). There are no competing interests.
Not applicable.
根据受孕方式(自然受孕、非体外受精(IVF)辅助生育治疗、IVF、卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)或卵子捐赠),双胎妊娠孕期及产后严重母体并发症的风险是否存在差异?
与自然双胎妊娠的女性相比,经医学辅助生殖(MAR)后的双胎妊娠女性发生严重母体并发症的总体风险高30%,且这种关联因MAR程序而异;使用自体卵子的IVF使风险增加50%,卵子捐赠使风险增加270%。
在多项关于单胎妊娠的一致研究中,IVF已被报道为严重母体并发症的一个风险因素。对于双胎妊娠,这种关联的记录较少,受孕方式分类不精确,结果相互矛盾。
研究设计、规模、持续时间:这是一项对双胎妊娠进行的全国性、观察性、前瞻性、基于人群的队列研究(JUmeaux Mode d'Accouchement)的二次分析,该研究于2014年2月10日至2015年3月1日在法国进行。所有年分娩量超过1500例的法国产科单位均受邀参与,无论其学术、公立或私立性质或护理水平如何。在191个符合条件的单位中,176个(92%)参与了研究。
参与者/材料、设置、方法:妊娠22周及以后分娩的双胎妊娠女性符合条件(纳入8823名女性)。我们排除了受孕方式未知的女性(n = 75)。严重母体并发症被归为最近出现的严重急性母体发病(SAMM)这一概念中,作为一个二元复合结局。感兴趣的暴露因素是受孕方式,分为五类:自然受孕(参照组)、包括授精和卵巢刺激在内的非IVF辅助生育治疗、使用自体卵子的IVF、使用自体卵子的ICSI和卵子捐赠。为评估受孕方式与SAMM之间的关联,我们使用多变量逻辑回归对混杂因素进行调整。结构方程模型(SEM)用于探索潜在中间因素对这种关联的影响,即可能由受孕方式引起并导致SAMM的因素:非重度子痫前期、前置胎盘和计划分娩方式。
在研究人群的8748名女性中,5890名(67.3%)自然受孕,854名(9.8%)接受非IVF辅助生育治疗,1307名(14.9%)使用自体卵子进行IVF,368名(4.2%)使用自体卵子进行ICSI,329名(3.8%)接受卵子捐赠。总体而言,538名(6.1%)发生了SAMM。在对混杂因素进行调整后,任何类型MAR后的双胎妊娠女性发生SAMM的风险均高于自然双胎妊娠女性(7.9%(227/2858)对比5.3%(311/5890),调整后的优势比(aOR)为1.3,95%置信区间(CI)为1.1 - 1.6)。这种关联因MAR程序而异。与参照组相比,使用自体卵子进行IVF(8.3%;108/1307)或卵子捐赠(14.0%;46/329)的女性发生SAMM的风险更高(分别为aOR 1.5,95% CI 1.1 - 1.9和aOR 2.7,95% CI 1.8 - 4.1),且卵子捐赠后的风险高于使用自体卵子(aOR 1.7,95% CI 1.1 - 2.6)。相反,接受非IVF辅助生育治疗(6.2%;53/854)和使用自体卵子进行ICSI(5.4%;20/368)的女性发生SAMM的风险与参照组(5.3%;311/5890)无差异(分别为aOR 1.1,95% CI 0.8 - 1.5和aOR 0.9,95% CI 0.6 - 1.5)。所测试的中间因素对这些增加的风险解释不足。
局限性、谨慎原因:除了我们分析中考虑的混杂因素和中间因素外,不孕的具体原因和不孕治疗的具体方面可能解释了受孕方式导致SAMM风险的差异。然而,这些数据不可用。
我们的研究表明,MAR后的双胎妊娠女性发生SAMM的风险增加,尤其是使用自体卵子进行IVF后,特别是卵子捐赠后。为避免不必要地暴露于MAR和多胎妊娠的高风险组合,应尽可能鼓励单胚胎移植。了解这些差异风险可能有助于临床医生与女性就受孕方式进行讨论,并有助于优化高风险亚组女性的产科护理。
研究资金/利益冲突:这项工作得到了法国卫生部的一项资助(临床研究项目,AOM2012)。不存在利益冲突。
不适用。