• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

去甲肾上腺素对认知灵活性的调节:应激、经皮迷走神经刺激和阿托西汀对人类任务转换均无影响。

Noradrenergic Regulation of Cognitive Flexibility: No Effects of Stress, Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation, and Atomoxetine on Task-switching in Humans.

机构信息

Leiden University.

Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition.

出版信息

J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Oct;32(10):1881-1895. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01603. Epub 2020 Jul 9.

DOI:10.1162/jocn_a_01603
PMID:32644883
Abstract

Cognitive flexibility allows us to adaptively switch between different responsibilities in important domains of our daily life. Previous work has elucidated the neurochemical basis underlying the ability to switch responses to a previously nonreinforced exemplar and to switch between attentional sets. However, the role of neuromodulators in task switching, the ability to rapidly switch between two or more cognitive tasks afforded by the same stimuli, is still poorly understood. We attempted to fill this gap by manipulating norepinephrine levels using stress manipulation (Study 1a, = 48; between-group design), transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation at two different intensities (Study 1b, = 48; sham-controlled between-group design), and pharmacological manipulation (Study 2, = 24; double-blind crossover design), all of which increased salivary cortisol measures. Participants repeatedly switched between two cognitive tasks (classifying a digit as high/low [Task 1] or as odd/even [Task 2]), depending on the preceding cue. On each trial, a cue indicated the task to be performed. The cue-stimulus interval was varied to manipulate the time to prepare for the switch. Participants showed typical switch costs, which decreased with the time available for preparation. None of the manipulations modulated the size of the switch costs or the preparation effect, as supported by frequentist and Bayesian model comparisons. Task-switching performance reflects a complex mix of cognitive control and bottom-up dynamics of task-set representations. Our findings suggest that norepinephrine does not affect either of these aspects of cognitive flexibility.

摘要

认知灵活性使我们能够在日常生活的重要领域中灵活地在不同的责任之间切换。以前的工作已经阐明了在响应先前未强化的范例和在注意力集中之间切换的能力的神经化学基础。然而,神经调节剂在任务切换中的作用,即能够快速在两个或多个认知任务之间切换的能力,仍然知之甚少。我们试图通过使用应激操纵(研究 1a,n = 48;组间设计)、两种不同强度的经皮迷走神经刺激(研究 1b,n = 48;假刺激对照组间设计)和药理学操纵(研究 2,n = 24;双盲交叉设计)来改变去甲肾上腺素水平来填补这一空白,所有这些都增加了唾液皮质醇测量值。参与者根据前一个提示在两个认知任务(将数字分类为高/低[任务 1]或奇/偶[任务 2])之间反复切换。在每次试验中,提示指示要执行的任务。提示-刺激间隔被改变以操纵用于准备切换的时间。参与者表现出典型的切换成本,随着准备时间的增加而降低。没有任何操作可以调节切换成本或准备效应的大小,这得到了频率主义和贝叶斯模型比较的支持。任务切换性能反映了认知控制和任务集表示的自下而上动态的复杂组合。我们的发现表明,去甲肾上腺素不会影响认知灵活性的这两个方面。

相似文献

1
Noradrenergic Regulation of Cognitive Flexibility: No Effects of Stress, Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation, and Atomoxetine on Task-switching in Humans.去甲肾上腺素对认知灵活性的调节:应激、经皮迷走神经刺激和阿托西汀对人类任务转换均无影响。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Oct;32(10):1881-1895. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01603. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
2
Dynamic Trial-by-Trial Recoding of Task-Set Representations in the Frontoparietal Cortex Mediates Behavioral Flexibility.额顶叶皮层中任务集表征的逐次动态编码介导行为灵活性。
J Neurosci. 2017 Nov 8;37(45):11037-11050. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0935-17.2017. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
3
The neuromodulatory and hormonal effects of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation as evidenced by salivary alpha amylase, salivary cortisol, pupil diameter, and the P3 event-related potential.经唾液 α-淀粉酶、唾液皮质醇、瞳孔直径和 P3 事件相关电位证明的经皮迷走神经刺激的神经调节和激素作用。
Brain Stimul. 2019 May-Jun;12(3):635-642. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.12.224. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
4
Task sets define boundaries of learned cognitive flexibility in list-wide proportion switch manipulations.任务集在广泛的比例切换操作中定义了习得认知灵活性的界限。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2023 Aug;49(8):1111-1122. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001138. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
5
No role of beta receptors in cognitive flexibility: Evidence from a task-switching paradigm in a randomized controlled trial.β受体在认知灵活性中无作用:来自一项随机对照试验中任务转换范式的证据。
Neuroscience. 2015 Jun 4;295:237-42. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.03.049. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
6
Neural Dynamics of Context-sensitive Adjustments in Cognitive Flexibility.神经动力学视角下认知灵活性的情境敏感性调整。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2022 Feb 1;34(3):480-494. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01813.
7
Atomoxetine effects on attentional bias to drug-related cues in cocaine dependent individuals.托莫西汀对可卡因依赖个体中与药物相关线索的注意偏向的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017 Aug;234(15):2289-2297. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4643-4. Epub 2017 May 27.
8
Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) enhances divergent thinking.经皮迷走神经刺激(tVNS)可增强发散思维。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Mar;111:72-76. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
9
Cue-switch effects do not rely on the same neural systems as task-switch effects.线索转换效应并不依赖于与任务转换效应相同的神经机制。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2011 Dec;11(4):600-7. doi: 10.3758/s13415-011-0055-9.
10
Task switching in mild cognitive impairment: switch and nonswitch costs.轻度认知障碍中的任务切换:切换成本和非切换成本。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2009 Jan;15(1):103-11. doi: 10.1017/S1355617708090140.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of cervical transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (ctVNS) on military cognitive performance during sleep deprivation.颈段经皮迷走神经刺激(ctVNS)对睡眠剥夺期间军事认知表现的影响。
Front Physiol. 2025 Feb 26;16:1542791. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1542791. eCollection 2025.
2
Vagus nerve stimulation: a physical therapy with promising potential for central nervous system disorders.迷走神经刺激:一种对中枢神经系统疾病具有潜在前景的物理治疗方法。
Front Neurol. 2024 Dec 13;15:1516242. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1516242. eCollection 2024.
3
Can transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation mitigate vigilance loss? Examining the effects of stimulation at individualized versus constant current intensity.
经皮耳迷走神经刺激能否减轻警觉性丧失?研究个体化与恒流强度刺激的效果。
Psychophysiology. 2025 Jan;62(1):e14670. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14670. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
4
Effects of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on the P300: Do Stimulation Duration and Stimulation Type Matter?经皮耳迷走神经刺激对P300的影响:刺激持续时间和刺激类型重要吗?
Brain Sci. 2024 Jul 10;14(7):690. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14070690.
5
Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS) applications in cognitive aging: a review and commentary.经皮迷走神经刺激(tVNS)在认知衰老中的应用:综述与评论
Front Aging Neurosci. 2023 Jul 11;15:1145207. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1145207. eCollection 2023.
6
Effect of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation on stress-reactive neuroendocrine measures in a sample of persons with temporal lobe epilepsy.经皮迷走神经刺激对颞叶癫痫患者应激反应神经内分泌指标的影响。
Epilepsia Open. 2023 Sep;8(3):1013-1020. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12774. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
7
Effects of Noninvasive Cervical Vagal Nerve Stimulation on Cognitive Performance But Not Brain Activation in Healthy Adults.无创性颈迷走神经刺激对健康成年人认知表现的影响,但对大脑激活无影响。
Neuromodulation. 2022 Apr;25(3):424-432. doi: 10.1111/ner.13313.
8
Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Improves Spatial Working Memory in Healthy Young Adults.经皮耳迷走神经刺激改善健康年轻人的空间工作记忆。
Front Neurosci. 2021 Dec 23;15:790793. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.790793. eCollection 2021.
9
International Consensus Based Review and Recommendations for Minimum Reporting Standards in Research on Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (Version 2020).基于国际共识的经皮迷走神经刺激研究最低报告标准的审查与建议(2020年版)
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Mar 23;14:568051. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.568051. eCollection 2020.