Suppr超能文献

去甲肾上腺素对认知灵活性的调节:应激、经皮迷走神经刺激和阿托西汀对人类任务转换均无影响。

Noradrenergic Regulation of Cognitive Flexibility: No Effects of Stress, Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation, and Atomoxetine on Task-switching in Humans.

机构信息

Leiden University.

Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition.

出版信息

J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Oct;32(10):1881-1895. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01603. Epub 2020 Jul 9.

Abstract

Cognitive flexibility allows us to adaptively switch between different responsibilities in important domains of our daily life. Previous work has elucidated the neurochemical basis underlying the ability to switch responses to a previously nonreinforced exemplar and to switch between attentional sets. However, the role of neuromodulators in task switching, the ability to rapidly switch between two or more cognitive tasks afforded by the same stimuli, is still poorly understood. We attempted to fill this gap by manipulating norepinephrine levels using stress manipulation (Study 1a, = 48; between-group design), transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation at two different intensities (Study 1b, = 48; sham-controlled between-group design), and pharmacological manipulation (Study 2, = 24; double-blind crossover design), all of which increased salivary cortisol measures. Participants repeatedly switched between two cognitive tasks (classifying a digit as high/low [Task 1] or as odd/even [Task 2]), depending on the preceding cue. On each trial, a cue indicated the task to be performed. The cue-stimulus interval was varied to manipulate the time to prepare for the switch. Participants showed typical switch costs, which decreased with the time available for preparation. None of the manipulations modulated the size of the switch costs or the preparation effect, as supported by frequentist and Bayesian model comparisons. Task-switching performance reflects a complex mix of cognitive control and bottom-up dynamics of task-set representations. Our findings suggest that norepinephrine does not affect either of these aspects of cognitive flexibility.

摘要

认知灵活性使我们能够在日常生活的重要领域中灵活地在不同的责任之间切换。以前的工作已经阐明了在响应先前未强化的范例和在注意力集中之间切换的能力的神经化学基础。然而,神经调节剂在任务切换中的作用,即能够快速在两个或多个认知任务之间切换的能力,仍然知之甚少。我们试图通过使用应激操纵(研究 1a,n = 48;组间设计)、两种不同强度的经皮迷走神经刺激(研究 1b,n = 48;假刺激对照组间设计)和药理学操纵(研究 2,n = 24;双盲交叉设计)来改变去甲肾上腺素水平来填补这一空白,所有这些都增加了唾液皮质醇测量值。参与者根据前一个提示在两个认知任务(将数字分类为高/低[任务 1]或奇/偶[任务 2])之间反复切换。在每次试验中,提示指示要执行的任务。提示-刺激间隔被改变以操纵用于准备切换的时间。参与者表现出典型的切换成本,随着准备时间的增加而降低。没有任何操作可以调节切换成本或准备效应的大小,这得到了频率主义和贝叶斯模型比较的支持。任务切换性能反映了认知控制和任务集表示的自下而上动态的复杂组合。我们的发现表明,去甲肾上腺素不会影响认知灵活性的这两个方面。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验