Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, Ghent 9000, Belgium.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2011 Dec;11(4):600-7. doi: 10.3758/s13415-011-0055-9.
The cued task-switching paradigm is often used to study cognitive control. In this paradigm, people are generally slower and make more errors when switching tasks as compared with repeating the same task. When two cues are mapped to each task, these switch costs could result from a mixture of cue-switch effects (which are thought to reflect cue encoding) and task-switch effects (which are thought to reflect task set preparation). In the behavioral literature, there has been a lively debate on the degree to which cue-switch effects and task-switch effects indeed reflect different phenomena. In the present study, we used fMRI to examine whether and to what extent the neural network underlying task-switch effects is also involved in cue-switch effects. We found task-switch but no cue-switch effects in the frequently observed preparation-related activation in fronto-parietal areas. These results suggest that the fronto-parietal areas displaying preparatory activity in task-switching paradigms are engaged in task preparation but not in cue encoding and that task preparation and cue encoding rely on completely different processes.
线索任务转换范式常用于研究认知控制。在这种范式中,与重复相同任务相比,人们在任务转换时通常会更慢,并且会犯更多的错误。当两个线索分别映射到每个任务时,这些转换成本可能来自于线索转换效应(被认为反映了线索编码)和任务转换效应(被认为反映了任务集准备)的混合。在行为文献中,对于线索转换效应和任务转换效应在多大程度上确实反映了不同的现象,一直存在激烈的争论。在本研究中,我们使用 fMRI 来研究任务转换效应背后的神经网络是否以及在何种程度上也涉及线索转换效应。我们发现,在额顶叶区域中经常观察到的与准备相关的激活中存在任务转换效应,但不存在线索转换效应。这些结果表明,在任务转换范式中显示出准备活动的额顶叶区域参与了任务准备,但不参与线索编码,并且任务准备和线索编码依赖于完全不同的过程。