Suppr超能文献

基于生物膜的亚硝态氮/厌氧氨氧化系统曝气控制策略的评估。

Assessment of aeration control strategies for biofilm-based partial nitritation/anammox systems.

机构信息

inCTRL Solutions Inc., Dundas, ON, Canada E-mail:

inCTRL Solutions Corp., New Haven, CT, USA.

出版信息

Water Sci Technol. 2020 Apr;81(8):1757-1765. doi: 10.2166/wst.2020.174.

Abstract

The objective of this work was to compare the nitrogen removal in mainstream, biofilm-based partial nitritation anammox (PN/A) systems employing (1) constant setpoint dissolved oxygen (DO) control, (2) intermittent aeration, and (3) ammonia-based aeration control (ABAC). A detailed water resource recovery facility (WRRF) model was used to study the dynamic performance of these aeration control strategies with respect to treatment performance and energy consumption. The results show that constant setpoint DO control cannot meet typical regulatory limits for total ammonia nitrogen (NH-N). Intermittent aeration shows improvement but requires optimisation of the aeration cycle. ABAC shows the best treatment performance with the advantages of continuous operation and over 20% lower average energy consumption as compared to intermittent aeration.

摘要

本工作旨在比较采用(1)恒设定点溶解氧(DO)控制、(2)间歇曝气和(3)基于氨的曝气控制(ABAC)的主流、基于生物膜的部分亚硝化厌氧氨氧化(PN/A)系统中的氮去除。详细的水资源回收厂(WRRF)模型用于研究这些曝气控制策略在处理性能和能源消耗方面的动态性能。结果表明,恒设定点 DO 控制不能满足总氨氮(NH-N)的典型法规限制。间歇曝气显示出改善,但需要优化曝气周期。ABAC 表现出最佳的处理性能,与间歇曝气相比,具有连续运行的优势和平均能耗降低 20%以上的优势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验