inCTRL Solutions Inc., Dundas, ON, Canada E-mail:
inCTRL Solutions Corp., New Haven, CT, USA.
Water Sci Technol. 2020 Apr;81(8):1757-1765. doi: 10.2166/wst.2020.174.
The objective of this work was to compare the nitrogen removal in mainstream, biofilm-based partial nitritation anammox (PN/A) systems employing (1) constant setpoint dissolved oxygen (DO) control, (2) intermittent aeration, and (3) ammonia-based aeration control (ABAC). A detailed water resource recovery facility (WRRF) model was used to study the dynamic performance of these aeration control strategies with respect to treatment performance and energy consumption. The results show that constant setpoint DO control cannot meet typical regulatory limits for total ammonia nitrogen (NH-N). Intermittent aeration shows improvement but requires optimisation of the aeration cycle. ABAC shows the best treatment performance with the advantages of continuous operation and over 20% lower average energy consumption as compared to intermittent aeration.
本工作旨在比较采用(1)恒设定点溶解氧(DO)控制、(2)间歇曝气和(3)基于氨的曝气控制(ABAC)的主流、基于生物膜的部分亚硝化厌氧氨氧化(PN/A)系统中的氮去除。详细的水资源回收厂(WRRF)模型用于研究这些曝气控制策略在处理性能和能源消耗方面的动态性能。结果表明,恒设定点 DO 控制不能满足总氨氮(NH-N)的典型法规限制。间歇曝气显示出改善,但需要优化曝气周期。ABAC 表现出最佳的处理性能,与间歇曝气相比,具有连续运行的优势和平均能耗降低 20%以上的优势。