• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善和提高终末期儿童生活质量的医疗干预措施:系统评价。

Healthcare interventions improving and reducing quality of life in children at the end of life: a systematic review.

机构信息

End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel and Ghent University, Brussels Health Campus-Building K Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent, Ghent University, Entrance 42 (K3), 6th floor, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Pediatr Res. 2021 Apr;89(5):1065-1077. doi: 10.1038/s41390-020-1036-x. Epub 2020 Jul 9.

DOI:10.1038/s41390-020-1036-x
PMID:32645707
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Children with serious illness suffer from symptoms at the end of life that often fail to be relieved. An overview is required of healthcare interventions improving and decreasing quality of life (QOL) for children with serious illness at the end of life.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed in five databases, January 2000 to July 2018 without language limit. Reviewers selected quantitative studies with a healthcare intervention, for example, medication or treatment, and QOL outcomes or QOL-related measures, for example, symptoms, for children aged 1-17 years with serious illness. One author assessed outcomes with the QualSyst and GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) Framework; two authors checked a 25% sample. QOL improvement or reduction was categorized.

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies met the eligibility criteria studying 20 unique interventions. Designs included 1 randomized controlled trial, 1 cross-sectional study, and 34 cohort studies. Patient-reported symptom monitoring increased QOL significantly in cancer patients in a randomized controlled trial. Dexmedetomidine, methadone, ventilation, pleurodesis, and palliative care were significantly associated with improved QOL, and chemotherapy, stem cell transplant, and hospitalization with reduced QOL, in cohort studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of patient-controlled symptom feedback, multidisciplinary palliative care teams with full-time practical support, inhalation therapy, and off-label sedative medication may improve QOL. Curative therapy may reduce QOL.

IMPACT

QOL for children at the end of life may be improved with patient-controlled symptom feedback, multidisciplinary palliative care teams with full-time practical support, inhalation therapy, and off-label sedative medication. QOL for children at the end of life may be reduced with therapy with a curative intent, such as curative chemotherapy or stem cell transplant. A comprehensive overview of current evidence to elevate currently often-failing QOL management for children at the end of life. New paradigm-level indicators for appropriate and inappropriate QOL management in children at the end of life. New hypotheses for future research, guided by the current knowledge within the field. Various healthcare interventions (as described above) could or might be employed as tools to provide relief in QOL management for children with serious illness, such as cancer, at the end of life, and therefore could be discussed in pediatrician end-of-life training to limit the often-failed QOL management in this population, cave the one-size-fits-all approach for individual cases. Multidisciplinary team efforts and 24/7 presence, especially practical support for parents, might characterize effective palliative care team interventions for children with serious illness at the end of life, suggesting a co-regulating link between well-being of the child partly to that of the parents Hypothesis-oriented research is needed, especially for children with nonmalignant disorders, such as genetic or neurological disorders at the end of life, as well as QOL outcomes for intervention research and psychosocial or spiritual outcomes.

摘要

背景

患有重病的儿童在生命末期会出现各种症状,而这些症状往往无法得到缓解。因此,我们需要对能够改善和提高患有重病的儿童生命末期生活质量(QOL)的医疗干预措施进行综述。

方法

我们在五个数据库中进行了系统评价,检索时间为 2000 年 1 月至 2018 年 7 月,不限制语言。综述人员选择了具有医疗干预措施(例如药物或治疗)和 QOL 结果或与 QOL 相关的措施(例如症状)的定量研究,纳入对象为年龄在 1-17 岁之间患有严重疾病的儿童。一名作者使用 QualSyst 和 GRADE(推荐分级的评估、制定与评价)框架评估结局;另外两名作者检查了 25%的样本。将 QOL 的改善或降低进行分类。

结果

符合纳入标准的研究有 36 项,涉及 20 种不同的干预措施。设计类型包括 1 项随机对照试验、1 项横断面研究和 34 项队列研究。在一项随机对照试验中,患者报告的症状监测显著提高了癌症患者的 QOL。在队列研究中,右美托咪定、美沙酮、通气、胸膜固定术和姑息治疗与 QOL 改善显著相关,而化疗、干细胞移植和住院与 QOL 降低显著相关。

结论

使用患者自控症状反馈、配备全职实用支持的多学科姑息治疗团队、吸入疗法和非标签镇静药物可能会提高 QOL。治愈性治疗可能会降低 QOL。

意义

使用患者自控症状反馈、配备全职实用支持的多学科姑息治疗团队、吸入疗法和非标签镇静药物,可能会提高患有重病的儿童在生命末期的 QOL。具有治愈意图的治疗,如治愈性化疗或干细胞移植,可能会降低儿童在生命末期的 QOL。这是对当前证据的全面综述,旨在提高目前在儿童生命末期管理中经常失败的 QOL 管理水平。针对儿童生命末期适当和不适当 QOL 管理的全新范式水平指标。以该领域的现有知识为指导,提出了未来研究的新假设。上述各种医疗干预措施(如上文所述)可作为工具,用于改善患有严重疾病(如癌症)的儿童的 QOL 管理,因此可在儿科医生的生命末期培训中进行讨论,以限制该人群中经常失败的 QOL 管理,避免一刀切的方法。多学科团队的努力和 24/7 的存在,尤其是为父母提供的实际支持,可能是对患有严重疾病的儿童的姑息治疗团队干预措施的有效特征,这表明儿童的幸福感与父母的幸福感之间存在一定的相互关系。需要进行假设导向的研究,特别是针对患有非恶性疾病(如遗传性或神经发育性疾病)的儿童,以及干预研究的 QOL 结局和心理社会或精神结局。

相似文献

1
Healthcare interventions improving and reducing quality of life in children at the end of life: a systematic review.改善和提高终末期儿童生活质量的医疗干预措施:系统评价。
Pediatr Res. 2021 Apr;89(5):1065-1077. doi: 10.1038/s41390-020-1036-x. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
4
Reducing unplanned hospital admissions from care homes: a systematic review.减少养老院的非计划性住院:系统评价。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Oct;11(18):1-130. doi: 10.3310/KLPW6338.
5
Comprehensive care programmes for children with medical complexity.针对患有复杂疾病儿童的综合护理方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 30;5(5):CD013329. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013329.pub2.
6
Psychosocial interventions for men with prostate cancer.针对前列腺癌男性患者的心理社会干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 24;2013(12):CD008529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008529.pub3.
7
Interventions for palliative symptom control in COVID-19 patients.干预措施以控制 COVID-19 患者的姑息症状。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 23;8(8):CD015061. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015061.
8
Technological aids for the rehabilitation of memory and executive functioning in children and adolescents with acquired brain injury.脑损伤儿童和青少年记忆与执行功能康复的技术辅助手段。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 1;7(7):CD011020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011020.pub2.
9
The clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of community-based interventions aimed at improving or maintaining quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: a systematic review.旨在改善或维持患有严重精神疾病父母的子女生活质量的社区干预措施的临床效果、成本效益和可接受性:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Feb;18(8):1-250. doi: 10.3310/hta18080.
10
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.

引用本文的文献

1
End of life care in paediatric settings: UK national survey.儿科环境中的临终关怀:英国全国性调查。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2025 Feb 26;15(2):221-230. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004673.
2
Appropriateness of end-of-life care for children with genetic and congenital conditions: a cohort study using routinely collected linked data.遗传性和先天性疾病儿童终末期医疗照护适宜性的研究:一项使用常规收集的关联数据的队列研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Sep;182(9):3857-3869. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05030-z. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
3
End of life in patients attended by pediatric palliative care teams: what factors influence the place of death and compliance with family preferences?

本文引用的文献

1
Methadone as the Initial Long-Acting Opioid in Children with Advanced Cancer.美沙酮作为晚期癌症儿童的初始长效阿片类药物。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Sep;21(9):1317-1321. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0712. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
2
Approaching the third decade of paediatric palliative oncology investigation: historical progress and future directions.步入儿科姑息肿瘤学研究的第三个十年:历史进展与未来方向
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2017 Sep;1(1):56-67. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(17)30014-7. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
3
Symptom Monitoring in Pediatric Oncology Using Patient-Reported Outcomes: Why, How, and Where Next.
儿科姑息治疗团队照护的终末期患者:哪些因素影响死亡地点和家庭意愿的遵从性?
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 May;182(5):2369-2377. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-04870-z. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
4
Emergency Palliative Cancer Care: Dexmedetomidine Treatment Experiences-A Retrospective Brief Report on Nine Consecutive Cases.急诊姑息性癌症护理:右美托咪定治疗经验——关于9例连续病例的回顾性简要报告
Pain Ther. 2023 Apr;12(2):593-605. doi: 10.1007/s40122-023-00485-2. Epub 2023 Feb 18.
5
End of life care for infants, children and young people (ENHANCE): Protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of current practice in the United Kingdom [version 1; peer review: 2 approved].婴儿、儿童和青少年临终关怀(ENHANCE):英国当前实践混合方法评估方案[第1版;同行评审:2人批准]
NIHR Open Res. 2022 May 13;2:37. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13273.1.
儿科肿瘤患者报告结局的症状监测:为何、如何及下一步方向。
Patient. 2018 Apr;11(2):147-153. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0279-z.
4
Disparities in the Intensity of End-of-Life Care for Children With Cancer.癌症患儿临终关怀强度的差异。
Pediatrics. 2017 Oct;140(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-0671.
5
Pediatric Palliative Care: A Five-Year Retrospective Chart Review Study.儿科姑息治疗:一项为期五年的回顾性图表审查研究。
J Palliat Med. 2017 Oct;20(10):1104-1111. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0038. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
6
The Use of Dexmedetomidine in Pediatric Palliative Care: A Preliminary Study.右美托咪定在儿科姑息治疗中的应用:一项初步研究。
J Palliat Med. 2017 Jul;20(7):779-783. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0419. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
7
Place of death of children with complex chronic conditions: cross-national study of 11 countries.患有复杂慢性病儿童的死亡地点:11个国家的跨国研究
Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Mar;176(3):327-335. doi: 10.1007/s00431-016-2837-0. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
8
Predictors of and Trends in High-Intensity End-of-Life Care Among Children With Cancer: A Population-Based Study Using Health Services Data.癌症儿童高强度临终关怀的预测因素和趋势:基于卫生服务数据的人群研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan 10;35(2):236-242. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.8283. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
9
PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement.电子检索策略的PRESS同行评审:2015年指南声明。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;75:40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
10
Chemotherapy Use, Performance Status, and Quality of Life at the End of Life.化疗的应用、终末期的体能状态和生活质量。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Sep;1(6):778-84. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2378.