Cruz Roja, Nursing Department, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain.
Podiatry Department, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 7;17(13):4882. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134882.
There is little scientific evidence regarding the effectiveness of strengthening exercises on the foot's intrinsic musculature in improving the lower limb on the statics and dynamics in healthy individuals. To evaluate the effect on foot posture with regard to the reinforcement of the short foot exercise (SFE) compared to another without a recognized biomechanical action, which we called the "non-biomechanical function" (NBF) exercise. A randomized clinical trial was carried out with 85 asymptomatic participants with a bilateral Foot Posture Index (FPI) greater than 6 points. An experimental group ( = 42) did SFE training and a control group ( = 43) carried out NBF exercises. The foot posture was evaluated twice via the navicular drop (ND) test, and the FPI was assessed on the day of inclusion in the study (pre-intervention) and after four weeks of training (post-intervention). Statistically significant values were not found in foot posture between the experimental and the control groups when comparing before and after the training. However, the foot posture was modified in both groups with respect to its initial state, and the ND value decreased. SFE could be considered a useful tool to deal with pathologies whose etiology includes excessive pronation of the foot.
关于强化练习对改善健康个体下肢静态和动态的足部内在肌肉的有效性,科学证据有限。为了评估足部姿势的影响,我们比较了短足运动(SFE)和另一种没有公认生物力学作用的运动(我们称之为“非生物力学功能”(NBF)运动)。对 85 名双侧足部姿势指数(FPI)大于 6 分的无症状参与者进行了一项随机临床试验。实验组(n=42)进行 SFE 训练,对照组(n=43)进行 NBF 运动。通过舟骨下降(ND)试验两次评估足部姿势,在研究纳入当天(干预前)和 4 周训练后(干预后)评估 FPI。在训练前后比较时,实验组和对照组之间的足部姿势没有发现统计学上的显著差异。然而,两组的足部姿势都相对于初始状态发生了改变,ND 值降低了。SFE 可以被认为是一种有用的工具,用于处理病因包括过度足内翻的病理。