Princess Máxima Center, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Radboudumc-Amalia Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Pediatr Surg. 2021 Mar;56(3):465-470. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.05.045. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
Minimal invasive surgery (MIS) is increasingly used for the correction of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) and esophageal atresia (EA). It is important to master these complex procedures, preferably preclinically, to avoid complications. The aim of this study was to validate recently developed models to train these MIS procedures preclinically.
Two low cost, reproducible models (one for CDH and one for EA) were validated during several pediatric surgical conferences and training sessions (January 2017-December 2018), used in either the LaparoscopyBoxx or EoSim simulator. Participants used one or both models and completed a questionnaire regarding their opinion on realism (face validity) and didactic value (content validity), rated on a five-point-Likert scale.
Of all 60 participants enrolled, 44 evaluated the EA model. All items were evaluated as significantly better than neutral, with means ranging from 3.7 to 4.1 (p < 0.001). The CDH model was evaluated by 48 participants. All items scored significantly better than neutral (means 3.5-3.9, p < 0.001), with exception of the haptics of the simulated diaphragm (mean 3.3, p = 0.054). Both models were considered a potent training tool (means 3.9).
These readily available and low budget models are considered a valid and potent training tool by both experts and target group participants.
Prospective study.
Level II.
微创外科(MIS)越来越多地用于治疗先天性膈疝(CDH)和食管闭锁(EA)。掌握这些复杂的手术程序非常重要,最好是在临床前阶段,以避免并发症。本研究旨在验证最近开发的模型,以在临床前阶段培训这些 MIS 手术。
在几个小儿外科会议和培训课程(2017 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月)中,对两种低成本、可重复使用的模型(一种用于 CDH,一种用于 EA)进行了验证,这些模型在腹腔镜盒(LaparoscopyBoxx)或 EoSim 模拟器中使用。参与者使用了一种或两种模型,并完成了一份关于他们对真实性(表面有效性)和教学价值(内容有效性)的看法的问卷,采用五点李克特量表评分。
在所有纳入的 60 名参与者中,有 44 名评估了 EA 模型。所有项目的评分均明显优于中立,均值范围为 3.7 至 4.1(p<0.001)。48 名参与者评估了 CDH 模型。所有项目的评分均明显优于中立(均值 3.5-3.9,p<0.001),除了模拟膈肌的触觉(均值 3.3,p=0.054)。两种模型均被认为是一种有效的培训工具(均值 3.9)。
这些易于获得且预算较低的模型被专家和目标群体参与者认为是一种有效的培训工具。
前瞻性研究。
II 级。