Department of Surgery, Radboudumc - department of surgery, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Amalia Children's hospital, Radboudumc - Amalia Children's hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Med Educ Online. 2023 Dec;28(1):2198818. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2023.2198818.
It is difficult, time consuming and expensive to assess manual skills in open surgery. The aim of this study is to investigate the construct validity of a low-cost, easily accessible tracking technique for basic open suturing tasks. Medical master students, surgical residents, and surgeons at the Radboud University Medical Center were recruited between September 2020 until September 2021. The participants were divided, according to experience, in a novice group (≤10 sutures performed) and an expert group (>50 sutures performed). For objective tracking, a tablet with SurgTrac software was used, which tracked a blue and a red tag placed on respectively their left and right index finger. The participants executed four basic tasks on a suturing model: 1) knot tying by hand, 2) transcutaneous suturing with an instrument knot, 3) 'Donati' (vertical mattress suture) with an instrument knot and 4) continuous intracutaneous suturing without a knot. In total 76 participants were included: 57 novices and 19 experts. All four tasks showed significant differences between the novice group and expert group for the parameters time (p<0.001), distance (p<0.001 for Task 1, 2 and 3 and p=0.034 for Task 4) and smoothness (p<0.001). Additionally, Task 3 showed a significant difference for the parameter handedness (p=0.006) and Task 4 for speed (p=0.033). Tracking index finger movements using SurgTrac software on a tablet while executing basic open suturing skills on a simulator shows excellent construct validity for time, distance and motion smoothness in all four suturing tasks.
在开放式手术中评估手工技能既困难又耗时,且费用高昂。本研究旨在探讨一种低成本、易于获取的跟踪技术,用于基本的开放式缝合任务,以评估其结构效度。2020 年 9 月至 2021 年 9 月,我们招募了来自 Radboud 大学医学中心的医学硕士研究生、住院医师和外科医生。根据经验,参与者被分为新手组(<10 次缝合)和专家组(>50 次缝合)。为了进行客观跟踪,我们使用带有 SurgTrac 软件的平板电脑,该软件跟踪放置在他们左右食指上的一个蓝色和一个红色标签。参与者在缝合模型上执行了四项基本任务:1)徒手打结,2)用器械结进行经皮缝合,3)用器械结进行'Donati'(垂直褥式缝合),4)连续皮内缝合而不打结。共有 76 名参与者入组:57 名新手和 19 名专家。所有四项任务的参数时间(p<0.001)、距离(任务 1、2 和 3 时 p<0.001,任务 4 时 p=0.034)和流畅度(p<0.001)在新手组和专家组之间均存在显著差异。此外,任务 3 在参数手性(p=0.006)方面存在显著差异,任务 4 在速度(p=0.033)方面存在显著差异。在模拟器上执行基本开放式缝合技能时,使用 SurgTrac 软件跟踪平板电脑上的食指运动,在所有四项缝合任务中均显示出时间、距离和运动流畅度的极佳结构效度。