Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2020 Sep;51(3):462-469. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2020.06.006. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
In postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT), some centres prescribe the use of a tissue-equivalent bolus to the skin to reduce the risk of chest wall recurrence. The addition of bolus causes an increase in the skin dose, which may lead to increased risk of radiodermatitis. Radiodermatitis can decrease patients' overall quality of life, bringing into question the benefit of using the bolus. The purpose of this retrospective chart review was to quantify the increase in skin dose associated with the use of bolus in the PMRT setting.
We evaluated 70 patients who underwent PMRT at our institution during 2012-2018. Two similar treatment plans were generated for each patient: one with bolus and one without. Skin dose-volume histogram values were evaluated, and statistical analysis was performed using MATLAB R2015b.
There was no significant difference in the maximum skin dose within a depth of 5 mm for bolus versus nonbolus plans (P = 0.4). However, within a depth of 3 mm, bolus plans had a maximum skin dose 7% ± 2.5% higher than the nonbolus plans (P < .00001). Mean skin dose within depths of 3 and 5 mm were both significantly higher (P < .00001) for bolus plans. The photon beam energy and chest wall separation showed minimal or no effect on skin dose.
Given the differing opinions in the literature regarding the role for bolus in PMRT, there is still uncertainty of the optimal treatment method. This retrospective study demonstrates a 20%-30% reduction in mean skin dose when bolus is not used.
在乳腺癌根治术后放疗(PMRT)中,一些中心规定使用组织等效敷贴来减少胸壁复发的风险。敷贴的加入会增加皮肤剂量,从而增加放射性皮炎的风险。放射性皮炎会降低患者的整体生活质量,这使得使用敷贴的益处受到质疑。本回顾性图表研究的目的是定量评估在 PMRT 中使用敷贴所增加的皮肤剂量。
我们评估了 2012 年至 2018 年在我们机构接受 PMRT 的 70 例患者。为每位患者生成了两种类似的治疗计划:一种有敷贴,另一种没有。评估了皮肤剂量-体积直方图值,并使用 MATLAB R2015b 进行了统计分析。
在 5mm 深度内,敷贴与非敷贴计划的最大皮肤剂量无显著差异(P = 0.4)。然而,在 3mm 深度内,敷贴计划的最大皮肤剂量比非敷贴计划高 7%±2.5%(P <.00001)。3mm 和 5mm 深度内的平均皮肤剂量均显著升高(P <.00001),敷贴计划的升高更为明显。光子束能量和胸壁分离对皮肤剂量的影响最小或没有。
鉴于文献中对 PMRT 中敷贴作用的不同观点,对于最佳治疗方法仍存在不确定性。本回顾性研究表明,不使用敷贴时,平均皮肤剂量可降低 20%-30%。