Li Fengyan, Hu Wendie, Li Hanzong, Li Bohan, Wang Yaxue
Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou P. R. of China.
Biomedical Forensic Science, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine: Graduate Medical Sciences, Boston, MA, USA.
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Jan-Dec;24:15330338251344521. doi: 10.1177/15330338251344521. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
IntroductionTissue-equivalent boluses are used to increase the skin surface dose in patients with breast cancer undergoing postmastectomy radiotherapy. Boluses made from various materials have been developed and applied in clinical practice. However, there is currently no international standardization for their use. This study aimed to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of using compensatory membranes (boluses), identify the optimal patient population for their postoperative application, and determine the most suitable types of compensatory membranes for use in postoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer.MethodsThis study includes a systematic literature review of sources such as websites, books, and articles from January 2013 to December 2023. We analyzed and compared studies on the use of compensatory membranes in postoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer, evaluating differences among various bolus materials as well as the impact of using no bolus. Outcomes such as patient responses and prognosis were also assessed. After excluding abstracts, reviews, and other non-research articles, a total of 32 studies were included in the analysis.Results3D-printed boluses and brass mesh boluses show promise as alternatives to traditional bolus materials, with potential for broader clinical application. The use of a bolus can increase the incidence of acute radiation-induced toxicities, without significant improvements in long-term patient prognosis. For patients receiving chest wall radiotherapy after breast cancer surgery, bolus use may be considered selectively, especially in those with high-risk factors.ConclusionCurrently, there is no unified standard for bolus use in breast cancer patients undergoing chest wall radiotherapy following modified radical mastectomy. This review provides a critical evaluation of existing literature, summarizing the available bolus materials and their influence on radiotherapy outcomes in postoperative breast cancer treatment.
引言
组织等效填充物用于增加接受乳房切除术后放疗的乳腺癌患者的皮肤表面剂量。已开发出由各种材料制成的填充物并应用于临床实践。然而,目前其使用尚无国际标准化。本研究旨在分析使用补偿膜(填充物)的优缺点,确定其术后应用的最佳患者群体,并确定用于乳腺癌术后放疗的最合适的补偿膜类型。
方法
本研究包括对2013年1月至2023年12月期间网站、书籍和文章等来源进行系统的文献综述。我们分析并比较了关于补偿膜在乳腺癌术后放疗中使用的研究,评估了各种填充物材料之间的差异以及不使用填充物的影响。还评估了患者反应和预后等结果。在排除摘要、综述和其他非研究文章后,共有32项研究纳入分析。
结果
3D打印填充物和黄铜网填充物显示出作为传统填充物材料替代品的潜力,具有更广泛临床应用的可能性。使用填充物可增加急性放射性毒性的发生率,而对患者长期预后无显著改善。对于乳腺癌手术后接受胸壁放疗的患者,可选择性考虑使用填充物,尤其是那些具有高危因素的患者。
结论
目前,在改良根治性乳房切除术后接受胸壁放疗的乳腺癌患者中,填充物的使用尚无统一标准。本综述对现有文献进行了批判性评估,总结了可用的填充物材料及其对乳腺癌术后放疗结果的影响。