Suppr超能文献

多参与者康复在熟练护理设施中:观察比较研究。

Multiparticipant Rehabilitation in Skilled Nursing Facilities: An Observational Comparison Study.

机构信息

Physical Therapy Program, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA; Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research (CCDOR), Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Dec;21(12):1920-1925. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.05.002. Epub 2020 Jul 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Post-acute care reform creates an impetus for skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) to reevaluate care delivery to promote value. One method to contain costs is to deliver rehabilitation with multiple individuals and 1 therapist. Our preliminary investigation proposed to identify clinical prescribing patterns for multiparticipant therapy and evaluate the impact on functional change.

DESIGN

The study design was observational with prospective data collection.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Data were collected on 458 individuals admitted to 1 SNF.

MEASURES

Therapists administered the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and gait speed at admission and discharge. Unadjusted binomial logistic regression models analyzed the odds ratio for receiving multiparticipant therapy. Linear regression models analyzed the impact of multiparticipant therapy on functional outcomes.

RESULTS

The odds of receiving multiparticipant therapy were greater with private pay or managed care compared with Medicare A [odds ratio (OR) 2.542; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.631-3.960 and OR 2.182; 95% CI 1.812-2.629] or a Medicare priority diagnosis (OR 1.333; 95% CI 1.176-1.511). The odds of not receiving multiparticipant therapy were greater with pain that affects activity and sleep (OR 0.836; 95% CI 0.710-0.984; OR 0.809; 95% CI 0.662-0.989). The amount of multiparticipant therapy sessions did not affect adjusted functional change in the SPPB or gait speed (P > .195). Irrespective of care delivery mode, individuals demonstrated levels of function predictive of adverse events at discharge.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Payer source, diagnosis, and presence of significant pain may play a role in selection for multiparticipant therapy, with no differences in functional outcomes related to rehabilitation delivery. Importantly, individuals discharge from the SNF at alarmingly low levels of function, prompting the need to assess SNF rehabilitation and transition to the community, regardless of care delivery mode. Further research will inform an evidence-based decision guide regarding different modes and quality of SNF rehabilitation care delivery.

摘要

目的

康复后护理改革为熟练护理机构(SNF)提供了重新评估护理服务以提升价值的动力。一种控制成本的方法是由 1 名治疗师为多名患者提供康复服务。我们的初步研究旨在确定多患者治疗的临床处方模式,并评估其对功能变化的影响。

设计

该研究设计为观察性研究,前瞻性收集数据。

地点和参与者

数据收集于一家 SNF 中收治的 458 名患者。

措施

治疗师在患者入院和出院时进行简易体能测试(SPPB)和步态速度评估。未调整的二项逻辑回归模型分析了接受多患者治疗的比值比。线性回归模型分析了多患者治疗对功能结局的影响。

结果

与医疗保险 A(比值比 [OR] 2.542;95%置信区间 [CI] 1.631-3.960 和 OR 2.182;95% CI 1.812-2.629)或医疗保险优先诊断(OR 1.333;95% CI 1.176-1.511)相比,私人支付或管理式医疗的患者接受多患者治疗的可能性更大。与疼痛影响活动和睡眠的患者(OR 0.836;95% CI 0.710-0.984;OR 0.809;95% CI 0.662-0.989)相比,不接受多患者治疗的可能性更大。多患者治疗的次数并未影响 SPPB 或步态速度的调整后的功能变化(P>.195)。无论护理模式如何,患者的功能水平均表明出院时存在不良事件的风险。

结论和意义

支付来源、诊断和严重疼痛的存在可能在多患者治疗的选择中发挥作用,而康复治疗模式对功能结局无影响。重要的是,患者从 SNF 出院时的功能水平低得惊人,这促使我们无论护理模式如何,都需要评估 SNF 康复情况并过渡到社区。进一步的研究将为不同模式和质量的 SNF 康复护理提供循证决策指南。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验