Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Oct;22(10):2201-2206. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.04.005. Epub 2021 May 7.
The Patient-Driven Payment Model (PDPM), a new reimbursement policy for Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNFs), was implemented in October 2019. PDPM disincentivizes provision of intensive physical and occupational therapy, however, there is concern that declines in therapy staffing may negatively impact patient outcomes. This study aimed to characterize the SNF industry response to PDPM in terms of therapy staffing.
Segmented regression interrupted time series.
15,432 SNFs in the United States.
Using SNF Payroll Based Journal data from January 1, 2019, through March 31, 2020, we calculated national weekly averages of therapy staffing minutes per patient-day for all therapy staff and for subgroups of physical and occupational therapists, therapy assistants, contract staff, and in-house employees. We used interrupted time series regression to estimate immediate and gradual effects of PDPM implementation.
Total therapy staffing minutes per patient-day declined by 5.5% in the week immediately following PDPM implementation (P < .001), and the trend experienced an additional decline of 0.2% per week for the first 6 months after PDPM compared with the negative pre-PDPM baseline trend (P < .001), for a 14.7% total decline by the end of March 2020. Physical and occupational therapy disciplines experienced similar immediate and gradual declines in staffing. Assistant and contract staffing reductions were larger than for therapist and in-house employees, respectively. All subgroups except for assistants and contract staff experienced significantly steeper declines in staffing trends compared with pre-PDPM trends.
SNFs appeared to have responded to PDPM with both immediate and gradual reductions in therapy staffing, with an average decline of 80 therapy staffing minutes over the average patient stay. Assistant and contract staff experienced the largest immediate declines. Therapy staffing and quality outcomes require ongoing monitoring to ensure staffing reductions do not have negative implications for patients.
患者驱动的支付模式(PDPM)是一种针对熟练护理设施(SNF)的新报销政策,于 2019 年 10 月实施。PDPM 不鼓励提供密集的物理和职业治疗,但人们担心治疗人员的减少可能会对患者的结果产生负面影响。本研究旨在从治疗人员配备的角度描述 SNF 行业对 PDPM 的反应。
分段回归中断时间序列。
美国的 15432 个 SNF。
使用 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 3 月 31 日的 SNF 工资单基础期刊数据,我们计算了每位患者每天的所有治疗人员和物理治疗师、职业治疗师、治疗助理、合同员工和内部员工亚组的治疗人员配备分钟的全国每周平均值。我们使用中断时间序列回归来估计 PDPM 实施的即时和渐进影响。
PDPM 实施后的第一周,每位患者每天的总治疗人员配备分钟数下降了 5.5%(P<0.001),并且在 PDPM 后的前 6 个月,与 PDPM 前的负趋势相比,每周又下降了 0.2%(P<0.001),到 2020 年 3 月底,总降幅为 14.7%。物理和职业治疗学科经历了类似的人员配备即时和渐进下降。助理和合同人员的减少分别大于治疗师和内部员工。除了助理和合同员工外,所有亚组的人员配备趋势下降都比 PDPM 前的趋势明显更陡峭。
SNF 似乎对 PDPM 做出了即时和渐进的治疗人员配备减少的反应,平均每位患者的治疗人员配备减少了 80 分钟。助理和合同员工经历了最大的即时下降。治疗人员配备和质量结果需要持续监测,以确保人员配备减少不会对患者产生负面影响。