Suppr超能文献

痴呆症神经精神症状的药物治疗:一项网状荟萃分析方案

Pharmacological treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia: a network meta-analysis protocol.

作者信息

Huang Yu-Yuan, Dou Kai-Xin, Zhong Xiao-Ling, Shen Xue-Ning, Chen Shi-Dong, Li Hong-Qi, Chen Ke-Liang, Cui Mei, Dong Qiang, Tan Lan, Yu Jin-Tai

机构信息

Department of Neurology and Institute of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Department of Neurology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.

出版信息

Ann Transl Med. 2020 Jun;8(12):746. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-611.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) of dementia are a common issue in dementia patients which can lead to poor medical and functional outcomes. Pharmacological interventions are its treatment of choice. However, whether to use pharmacological treatments in this population and which drug should be preferred remain controversial. We therefore aimed to compare and rank pharmacological interventions for NPS according to their efficacy and acceptability profiles by quantifying information from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

We will include all RCTs reported as double-blind and comparing one active drug with another or with placebo that compare cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs), N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor modulators, antipsychotics, antidepressants, and mood stabilisers. Studies will be retrieved by searching electronic databases, including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, MEDLINE, Clinicaltrial.govs, EMBASE, and with no date or language restrictions. The primary outcomes were efficacy (change in overall symptoms) and acceptability (all-cause discontinuation). The network meta-analysis (NMA) will be conducted in R software within a Bayesian framework. The quality of evidence will be evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and the GRADE approach. We will conduct subgroup analyses to assess the robustness of our findings.

RESULTS

The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review will synthesize the available evidence on the comparative efficacy of different pharmacological approaches in the management of overall NPS, agitation, psychosis, apathy and depressive symptoms in dementia patients. The results of the present NMA will influence evidence-based treatment decisions for clinicians.

摘要

背景

痴呆症的神经精神症状(NPS)是痴呆症患者的常见问题,可导致不良的医疗和功能预后。药物干预是其首选治疗方法。然而,在这一人群中是否使用药物治疗以及应首选哪种药物仍存在争议。因此,我们旨在通过量化随机对照试验(RCT)的信息,根据其疗效和可接受性概况对NPS的药物干预进行比较和排序。

方法

我们将纳入所有报告为双盲的RCT,这些试验比较一种活性药物与另一种活性药物或与安慰剂,比较胆碱酯酶抑制剂(ChEIs)、N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)受体调节剂、抗精神病药物、抗抑郁药物和心境稳定剂。将通过检索电子数据库来获取研究,包括Cochrane对照试验中心注册库、PubMed、MEDLINE、Clinicaltrial.govs、EMBASE,且无日期或语言限制。主要结局为疗效(总体症状变化)和可接受性(全因停药)。将在贝叶斯框架内的R软件中进行网络荟萃分析(NMA)。将使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具和GRADE方法评估证据质量。我们将进行亚组分析以评估研究结果的稳健性。

结果

本研究结果将发表在同行评审期刊上。

结论

本系统评价将综合现有证据,比较不同药物治疗方法对痴呆症患者总体NPS、激越、精神病、淡漠和抑郁症状的疗效。本次NMA的结果将影响临床医生基于证据的治疗决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6b5/7333122/bee8aca8b05f/atm-08-12-746-f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验