Zhou Xinyu, Cipriani Andrea, Zhang Yuqing, Cuijpers Pim, Hetrick Sarah E, Weisz John R, Pu Juncai, Del Giovane Cinzia, Furukawa Toshiaki A, Barth Jürgen, Coghill David, Leucht Stefan, Yang Lining, Ravindran Arun V, Xie Peng
Department of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK.
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 11;7(8):e016608. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016608.
Depressive disorder is common in children and adolescents, with important consequences and serious impairments in terms of personal and social functioning. While both pharmacological and psychological interventions have been shown to be effective, there is still uncertainty about the balance between these and what treatment strategy should be preferred in clinical practice. Therefore, we aim to compare and rank in a network meta-analysis (NMA) the commonly used psychological, pharmacological and combined interventions for depressive disorder in children and adolescents.
We will update the literature search of two previous NMAs for the identification of trials of antidepressant and psychotherapy alone for depressive disorder in children and adolescents. For identification of trials of combination interventions, seven databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL, LiLACS) will be searched from date of inception. We will also search ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and check relevant reports on the US Food and Drug Administration website for unpublished data. Building on our previous findings in the field, we will include any commonly prescribed oral antidepressants and any manualised or structured psychotherapies, as well as their combinations. Randomised controlled trials assessing any active intervention against active comparator or pill placebo/psychological controls in acute treatment for depressive disorder in children and adolescents will be included. The primary outcomes will be efficacy (mean change in depressive symptoms), and acceptability of treatment (dropout rate due to any cause). The secondary outcomes will be remission rate, tolerability of treatment (dropouts for adverse events), as well as suicide-related outcomes (suicidal behaviour or ideation). We will perform Bayesian NMAs for all relative outcome measures. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses will be conducted to assess the robustness of the findings.
This NMA will provide the most up to date and clinically useful information about the comparative efficacy and acceptability of antidepressants, psychological intervention and their combination in the acute treatment of children and adolescents with depressive disorder. This is the newest NMA and therefore these results are very important in terms of evidence-based medicine. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication.
PROSPERO CRD42015020841.
抑郁症在儿童和青少年中很常见,在个人和社会功能方面会产生重要后果并造成严重损害。虽然药物和心理干预都已被证明是有效的,但在这些干预措施之间的平衡以及临床实践中应优先选择何种治疗策略方面仍存在不确定性。因此,我们旨在通过网络荟萃分析(NMA)对儿童和青少年抑郁症常用的心理、药物及联合干预措施进行比较和排序。
我们将更新之前两项网络荟萃分析的文献检索,以识别单独使用抗抑郁药和心理治疗来治疗儿童和青少年抑郁症的试验。为了识别联合干预试验,将从创建日期开始检索七个数据库(PubMed、EMBASE、CENTRAL(Cochrane对照试验中心注册库)、Web of Science、PsycINFO、CINAHL、LiLACS)。我们还将检索ClinicalTrials.gov、世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台,并查看美国食品药品监督管理局网站上的相关报告以获取未发表的数据。基于我们之前在该领域的研究结果,我们将纳入任何常用的口服抗抑郁药、任何手册化或结构化心理治疗方法以及它们的组合。将纳入评估针对儿童和青少年抑郁症急性治疗中任何活性干预措施与活性对照或丸剂安慰剂/心理对照的随机对照试验。主要结局将是疗效(抑郁症状的平均变化)和治疗的可接受性(因任何原因导致的脱落率)。次要结局将是缓解率、治疗耐受性(因不良事件导致的脱落)以及与自杀相关的结局(自杀行为或想法)。我们将对所有相对结局指标进行贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。将进行亚组分析和敏感性分析以评估研究结果的稳健性。
这项网络荟萃分析将提供有关抗抑郁药、心理干预及其组合在儿童和青少年抑郁症急性治疗中的比较疗效和可接受性的最新且临床上有用的信息。这是最新的网络荟萃分析,因此这些结果在循证医学方面非常重要。结果将通过同行评审发表进行传播。
PROSPERO CRD42015020841