Meredith Sean J, Rauer Thomas, Chmielewski Terese L, Fink Christian, Diermeier Theresa, Rothrauff Benjamin B, Svantesson Eleonor, Hamrin Senorski Eric, Hewett Timothy E, Sherman Seth L, Lesniak Bryson P, Bizzini Mario, Chen Shiyi, Cohen Moises, Villa Stefano Della, Engebretsen Lars, Feng Hua, Ferretti Mario, Fu Freddie H, Imhoff Andreas B, Kaeding Christopher C, Karlsson Jon, Kuroda Ryosuke, Lynch Andrew D, Menetrey Jacques, Musahl Volker, Navarro Ronald A, Rabuck Stephen J, Siebold Rainer, Snyder-Mackler Lynn, Spalding Tim, van Eck Carola, Vyas Dharmesh, Webster Kate, Wilk Kevin
Investigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Jun 30;8(6):2325967120930829. doi: 10.1177/2325967120930829. eCollection 2020 Jun.
A precise and consistent definition of return to sport (RTS) after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is lacking, and there is controversy surrounding the process of returning patients to sport and their previous activity level.
The aim of the Panther Symposium ACL Injury Return to Sport Consensus Group was to provide a clear definition of RTS after ACL injury and a description of the RTS continuum as well as provide clinical guidance on RTS testing and decision-making.
Consensus statement.
An international, multidisciplinary group of ACL experts convened as part of a consensus meeting. Consensus statements were developed using a modified Delphi method. Literature review was performed to report the supporting evidence.
Key points include that RTS is characterized by achievement of the preinjury level of sport and involves a criteria-based progression from return to participation to RTS and, ultimately, return to performance. Purely time-based RTS decision-making should be abandoned. Progression occurs along an RTS continuum, with decision-making by a multidisciplinary group that incorporates objective physical examination data and validated and peer-reviewed RTS tests, which should involve functional assessment as well as psychological readiness. Consideration should be given to biological healing, contextual factors, and concomitant injuries.
The resultant consensus statements and scientific rationale aim to inform the reader of the complex process of RTS after ACL injury that occurs along a dynamic continuum. Research is needed to determine the ideal RTS test battery, the best implementation of psychological readiness testing, and methods for the biological assessment of healing and recovery.
前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤后恢复运动(RTS)缺乏精确且一致的定义,围绕患者恢复运动及其先前活动水平的过程存在争议。
黑豹研讨会ACL损伤恢复运动共识小组的目的是提供ACL损伤后RTS的明确定义以及RTS连续过程的描述,并提供有关RTS测试和决策的临床指导。
共识声明。
一个国际多学科ACL专家小组作为共识会议的一部分召开会议。使用改良的德尔菲法制定共识声明。进行文献综述以报告支持证据。
要点包括,RTS的特征是达到损伤前的运动水平,涉及从恢复参与到RTS,最终到恢复表现的基于标准的进展。应摒弃单纯基于时间的RTS决策。进展沿着RTS连续过程发生,由多学科小组进行决策,该小组纳入客观的体格检查数据以及经过验证和同行评审的RTS测试,其中应包括功能评估以及心理准备情况。应考虑生物愈合、背景因素和并发损伤。
所得的共识声明和科学依据旨在让读者了解ACL损伤后RTS的复杂过程,该过程沿着动态连续过程发生。需要开展研究以确定理想的RTS测试组合、心理准备情况测试的最佳实施方式以及愈合和恢复的生物评估方法。