College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Queensland, Australia.
Department of Rural Health, University of Melbourne, Australia.
Health Promot Int. 2021 Apr 15;36(2):505-523. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaa049.
High-income countries (HICs) in sub-tropical and tropical regions are at an increasing risk of Aedes mosquito-borne disease (MBD) outbreaks such as dengue fever. As the Aedes mosquito predominately lives and breeds in and around people's homes, community participation in MBD management is an important part of preventing MBD outbreaks. Historically, government-led strategies have dominated community participation efforts as opposed to strategies co-designed or led by the community. A scoping review was conducted to describe the community participation and empowering approaches used in Aedes mosquito management specifically in HICs, and to identify any reported outcomes of these methods. A systematic search of peer-reviewed literature using electronic databases Medline (OVID), Web of Science, Scopus and ProQuest-Science and Technology as well as grey literature, found 19 studies that matched the review criteria. The review findings highlight a lack of empirical evidence to inform participatory and empowering approaches to mosquito management in HICs. Moreover, the rationale for using predominantly government-led approaches is not clear. Further research is required to better understand best approaches and barriers to employing empowering approaches in mosquito management in HICs.
高收入国家（HICs）在亚热带和热带地区面临着越来越多的登革热等埃及伊蚊传播疾病（MBD）爆发的风险。由于埃及伊蚊主要生活和繁殖在人们的家庭内外，社区参与蚊媒疾病管理是预防蚊媒疾病爆发的重要组成部分。从历史上看，政府主导的战略主导了社区参与的努力，而不是由社区共同设计或主导的战略。本研究进行了范围综述，以描述在高收入国家专门针对埃及伊蚊管理中使用的社区参与和赋权方法，并确定这些方法的任何报告结果。使用电子数据库 Medline（OVID）、Web of Science、Scopus 和 ProQuest-Science and Technology 以及灰色文献对同行评议文献进行了系统搜索，共找到 19 项符合审查标准的研究。审查结果突出表明，缺乏有关参与式和赋权方法的经验证据来指导高收入国家的蚊子管理。此外，使用主要由政府主导的方法的理由并不明确。需要进一步研究，以更好地了解在高收入国家蚊子管理中采用赋权方法的最佳方法和障碍。
