• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中桡动脉到股动脉交叉入路的预测因素和临床结局。

Predictors and Clinical Outcomes of Crossover From Radial to Femoral Access During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

机构信息

Cardiology Department, 175679Sakarya University Education and Research Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey.

Cardiology Department, Vakfıkebir State Hospital, Trabzon, Turkey.

出版信息

Angiology. 2020 Oct;71(9):847-852. doi: 10.1177/0003319720940128. Epub 2020 Jul 10.

DOI:10.1177/0003319720940128
PMID:32648474
Abstract

Access site complications are more common with femoral access (FA) than radial access (RA). However, due to the higher rate of failure and crossover, door-to-balloon time (DBT) is prolonged by RA. Records of 3600 patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) between January 2016 and June 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 130 patients with crossover from RA to FA were identified and compared with the data of 501 patients who underwent pPCI with successful RA during 2018. Regression analysis was performed to determine the predictors of crossover. Crossover to the femoral approach occurred in 5.9% of our cases. Mean DBT was 17 minutes longer in the crossover group (61 ± 72 minutes vs 78 ± 79 minutes, = .026). Female sex (odds ratio [OR]: 1.8; 95% CI, 0.99-3.46, = .046) and anterior myocardial infarction (AntMI; OR: 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33-0.88, = .007) were independent predictors of crossover. In-hospital mortality rates were significantly higher in the crossover group than in the radial success group (5.4% vs 1.8%, = .020). Crossover to FA due to radial failure is associated with delayed DBT and increased rate of in-hospital mortality. Female sex and AntMI were primary predictors of crossover.

摘要

经股动脉入路(FA)的入路并发症比经桡动脉入路(RA)更为常见。然而,由于 RA 的失败率和交叉更高,球囊到达时间(DBT)延长。回顾了 2016 年 1 月至 2019 年 6 月期间接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(pPCI)的 3600 例患者的记录。确定了 130 例从 RA 转为 FA 的交叉患者,并与 2018 年成功接受 RA 治疗的 501 例 pPCI 患者的数据进行了比较。进行回归分析以确定交叉的预测因素。我们的病例中有 5.9%发生交叉到股动脉入路。交叉组的平均 DBT 延长了 17 分钟(61 ± 72 分钟 vs 78 ± 79 分钟, =.026)。女性(优势比 [OR]:1.8;95%置信区间,0.99-3.46, =.046)和前壁心肌梗死(AntMI;OR:0.52;95%置信区间,0.33-0.88, =.007)是交叉的独立预测因素。交叉组的院内死亡率明显高于 RA 成功组(5.4%比 1.8%, =.020)。由于桡动脉失败而转为 FA 与 DBT 延迟和院内死亡率增加有关。女性和 AntMI 是交叉的主要预测因素。

相似文献

1
Predictors and Clinical Outcomes of Crossover From Radial to Femoral Access During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中桡动脉到股动脉交叉入路的预测因素和临床结局。
Angiology. 2020 Oct;71(9):847-852. doi: 10.1177/0003319720940128. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
2
Effect of radial-to-femoral access crossover on adverse outcomes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention.桡动脉至股动脉入路转换对直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗不良结局的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Oct 15;114(8):1165-73. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.07.033. Epub 2014 Jul 29.
3
Predictors of Radial to Femoral Artery Access Crossover During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.预测经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者桡动脉至股动脉入路交叉的因素。
Heart Lung Circ. 2022 Jul;31(7):985-992. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2022.01.016. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
4
Predictors of radial to femoral artery crossover during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.预测 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时桡动脉至股动脉交叉的因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Aust Crit Care. 2023 Sep;36(5):915-923. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2022.10.018. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
5
Relationship Between Arterial Access and Outcomes in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With a Pharmacoinvasive Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategy: Insights From the STrategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction (STREAM) Study.药物介入与直接经皮冠状动脉介入策略治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的动脉入路与结局的关系:来自心肌梗死后早期强化再灌注策略(STREAM)研究的见解。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Jun 13;5(6):e003559. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003559.
6
Clinical Outcomes and Associations With Radial to Femoral Crossover in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死中桡动脉至股动脉交叉的临床结局及相关性
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Aug 1;200:103-111. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.05.020. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
7
Radial versus femoral vascular access in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Are the results of femoral operators unfairly represented in observational research?经桡动脉与股动脉入路在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死中的比较:股动脉操作者的观察性研究结果是否受到不公正的影响?
Am Heart J. 2019 Apr;210:81-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.12.009. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
8
Association of adoption of transradial access for percutaneous coronary intervention in ST elevation myocardial infarction with door-to-balloon time.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死中经桡动脉入路的采用与球囊扩张时间的关系。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Aug;96(2):E165-E173. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28785. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
9
Radial artery access is associated with lower mortality in patients undergoing primary PCI: a report from the SWEDEHEART registry.桡动脉入路与行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者的死亡率降低相关:来自 SWEDEHEART 注册研究的报告。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Jun;9(4):323-332. doi: 10.1177/2048872620908032.
10
[Comparison of radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians with acute coronary syndrome].[老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中桡动脉与股动脉入路的比较]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2014 Jul 8;94(26):2025-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Culprit Lesion Coronary Intervention Before Complete Angiography in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.罪犯病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死完全血管造影前:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e243729. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.3729.