• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

极早产儿的死产儿和活产儿。

Stillbirths and live births in the periviable period.

机构信息

Division of Epidemiology, UC Berkeley School of Public Health, Berkeley, CA; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

Ann Epidemiol. 2020 Sep;49:8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.07.002. Epub 2020 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.07.002
PMID:32648545
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8211124/
Abstract

PURPOSE

We use data from California, where 13% of US births occur, to address two questions arising from efforts in the first decade of this century to avoid stillbirths before 25 6/7 weeks of gestation (i.e., in the periviable period). First, did stillbirths decline in the first decade of this century? Second, if stillbirths did decline, did periviable live births increase simultaneously? Answering these questions is important given that periviable infants represent less than 1% of live births but account for roughly 40% of infant mortality and 20% of hospital-based obstetric costs in the United States.

METHODS

We constructed 240 monthly conception cohorts, starting with that conceived in January 1991, from 9,880,536 singleton pregnancies that reached the 20 0/7 week of gestation. We used time-series design and Box-Jenkins methods that address confounding by autocorrelation, including secular trends and seasonality to answer our questions.

RESULTS

We detected a downward shift in stillbirths in April 2007 that coincided with an upward shift in periviable live births.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings imply that, since 2007, fewer Californians than expected from history and from the size of conception cohorts reaching 20 0/7 weeks of gestation have had to contend with the sequelae of stillbirths, but more than expected likely have had to contend with those of periviable births.

摘要

目的

我们利用来自加利福尼亚州的数据(该州占美国出生人口的 13%)来回答本世纪初避免在 25 6/7 周之前(即围产前期)发生死产的努力中出现的两个问题。首先,本世纪初死产是否有所下降?其次,如果死产确实有所下降,围产前期的活产是否同时增加?鉴于围产前期婴儿占活产儿的比例不到 1%,但在美国占婴儿死亡率的 40%左右,占产科住院费用的 20%左右,因此回答这些问题很重要。

方法

我们从 9880536 例达到 20 0/7 周妊娠的单胎妊娠中构建了 240 个每月受孕队列,从 1991 年 1 月受孕的队列开始。我们使用时间序列设计和 Box-Jenkins 方法来回答我们的问题,这些方法可以解决自相关引起的混杂,包括长期趋势和季节性。

结果

我们发现,2007 年 4 月死产出现了下降趋势,同期围产前期活产出现了上升趋势。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,自 2007 年以来,加利福尼亚州的死产后果比预期的要少,因为从历史和达到 20 0/7 周妊娠的受孕队列的规模来看,有更多的人可能不得不应对围产前期出生的后果。

相似文献

1
Stillbirths and live births in the periviable period.极早产儿的死产儿和活产儿。
Ann Epidemiol. 2020 Sep;49:8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.07.002. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
2
Stillbirth and Live Birth at Periviable Gestational Age: A Comparison of Prevalence and Risk Factors.极早产儿的死产与活产:患病率和危险因素比较。
Am J Perinatol. 2019 Apr;36(5):537-544. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1670633. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
3
African American Unemployment and the Disparity in Periviable Births.非裔美国人的失业率与围产儿出生差异。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022 Jun;9(3):840-848. doi: 10.1007/s40615-021-01022-7. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
4
The 2016 presidential election and periviable births among Latina women.2016 年美国总统大选与拉丁裔产妇围产儿结局
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Dec;151:105203. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105203. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
5
Postpartum readmission risk: a comparison between stillbirths and live births.产后再入院风险:死胎与活产的比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Oct;231(4):463.e1-463.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.02.017. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
6
Birth weight in live births and stillbirths.活产儿和死产儿的出生体重。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;48(5):602-606. doi: 10.1002/uog.17287.
7
Trends in Stillbirth by Gestational Age in the United States, 2006-2012.2006 - 2012年美国不同孕周死产情况的趋势
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;126(6):1146-1150. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001152.
8
Levels, Trends, and Risk Factors for Stillbirths in the United States: 2000-2017.美国 2000-2017 年死产率的水平、趋势和危险因素。
Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e601-e611. doi: 10.1055/a-1925-2131. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
9
Estimates of Stillbirths, Neonatal Mortality, and Medically Vulnerable Live Births in Amhara, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚阿姆哈拉地区的死产、新生儿死亡和医学脆弱活产估计数。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2218534. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.18534.
10
Association between stillbirth and risk factors known at pregnancy confirmation.死产与妊娠确认时已知危险因素的关系。
JAMA. 2011 Dec 14;306(22):2469-79. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1798.

引用本文的文献

1
Twinning during the pandemic: Evidence of selection .疫情期间的双胞胎现象:选择的证据
Evol Med Public Health. 2021 Oct 20;9(1):374-382. doi: 10.1093/emph/eoab033. eCollection 2021.
2
Stillbirth as left truncation for early neonatal death in California, 1989-2015: a time-series study.1989-2015 年加利福尼亚州的死产作为早期新生儿死亡的左截断:时间序列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jul 2;21(1):478. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03852-z.
3
African American Unemployment and the Disparity in Periviable Births.非裔美国人的失业率与围产儿出生差异。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022 Jun;9(3):840-848. doi: 10.1007/s40615-021-01022-7. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
4
The 2016 presidential election and periviable births among Latina women.2016 年美国总统大选与拉丁裔产妇围产儿结局
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Dec;151:105203. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105203. Epub 2020 Oct 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethics of resuscitation for extremely premature infants: a systematic review of argument-based literature.极早产儿复苏的伦理学:基于论证的文献系统综述
J Med Ethics. 2020 Apr 27. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106102.
2
Birth Hospitalization Costs and Days of Care for Mothers and Neonates in California, 2009-2011.加利福尼亚州 2009-2011 年产妇和新生儿住院费用及护理天数。
J Pediatr. 2019 Jan;204:118-125.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.08.041. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
3
Stillbirth and Live Birth at Periviable Gestational Age: A Comparison of Prevalence and Risk Factors.极早产儿的死产与活产:患病率和危险因素比较。
Am J Perinatol. 2019 Apr;36(5):537-544. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1670633. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
4
Interventions for investigating and identifying the causes of stillbirth.调查和确定死产原因的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 30;4(4):CD012504. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012504.pub2.
5
Every Woman, Every Child's 'Progress in Partnership' for stillbirths: a commentary by the stillbirth advocacy working group.“每个妇女、每个儿童”减少死产的“伙伴关系进展”:死产宣传工作组的评论
BJOG. 2018 Aug;125(9):1058-1060. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15113. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
6
The fetuses-at-risk approach: survival analysis from a fetal perspective.高危胎儿法:从胎儿角度进行的生存分析。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Apr;97(4):454-465. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13194. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
7
Survival of Infants Born at Periviable Gestational Ages.近可存活孕周出生婴儿的存活情况
Clin Perinatol. 2017 Jun;44(2):287-303. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
8
Interventions to prevent stillbirth.预防死产的干预措施。
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 Jun;22(3):135-145. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2017.02.010. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
9
The psychological, social, and economic impact of stillbirth on families.死产对家庭的心理、社会和经济影响。
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 Jun;22(3):129-134. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
10
Survival and Major Morbidity of Extremely Preterm Infants: A Population-Based Study.极度早产儿的生存和主要发病率:一项基于人群的研究。
Pediatrics. 2016 Jul;138(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-4434. Epub 2016 Jun 14.