Suppr超能文献

比较静脉注射和静脉注射联合口服糖皮质激素治疗格雷夫斯眼病的疗效和安全性。

Comparison of efficacy and safety of parenteral versus parenteral and oral glucocorticoid therapy in Graves' orbitopathy.

机构信息

Clinic for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.

Medical Faculty, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2020 Nov;74(11):e13608. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13608. Epub 2020 Aug 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The most effective and safe treatment protocol for Graves' orbitopathy (GO) needs to be further assessed. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety and outcome of parenteral versus parenteral and oral glucocorticoid (GC) protocols in euthyroid patients with untreated and active moderate to severe GO.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study in 140 patients comparing intravenous GC pulses only (IVGC group, 74 patients, 51 ± 11 years) with historical controls of combined oral and intravenous GC therapy (CombGC group, 66 patients, 49 ± 10 years, P = ns). IVGC therapy included infusions of 500 mg of methylprednisolone weekly for the first six weeks, followed by infusions of 250 mg weekly for the remaining six weeks (cumulative dose 4.5 g). CombGC therapy included 500 mg of methylprednisolone in 500 mL of saline solution for two alternative days, followed by oral prednisone tapering dose repeated each month for the next 5 months (cumulative dose 10.2 g).

RESULTS

The overall success of the treatment was 43/66 (65%) in the CombGC group and 37/73 (51%, P = .071) in the IVGC group. Deterioration of GO developed in four (6%) patients during CombGC therapy and in nine (12%, P = .214) patients during IVGC therapy. After 6 months, relapse of GO was observed in 10/37 (26%) in the IVGC group, whereas none of the patients in CombGC had a relapse (P < .001). There were significantly more side effects in the CombGC versus IVGC group (49/66, 74% vs 28/74, 38%, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that CombGC therapy was more efficient with significantly less relapse rate, but with more side effects in comparison to IVGC therapy.

摘要

背景/目的:需要进一步评估格雷夫斯眼病(GO)的最有效和安全的治疗方案。本研究的目的是评估未经治疗和活动期中度至重度 GO 的甲状腺功能正常患者中,静脉内糖皮质激素(GC)与静脉内和口服 GC 方案的疗效、安全性和结果。

方法

这是一项回顾性观察研究,比较了仅静脉内 GC 脉冲治疗(IVGC 组,74 例,51±11 岁)与联合口服和静脉内 GC 治疗的历史对照(CombGC 组,66 例,49±10 岁,P=ns)。IVGC 治疗包括前 6 周每周给予 500mg 甲泼尼龙静脉滴注,然后每周给予 250mg 静脉滴注,共 6 周(累积剂量 4.5g)。CombGC 治疗包括在 500mL 生理盐水溶液中给予 500mg 甲泼尼龙,每 2 天交替 1 次,然后每月口服泼尼松递减剂量,持续 5 个月(累积剂量 10.2g)。

结果

在 CombGC 组中,总体治疗成功率为 66 例中的 43 例(65%),在 IVGC 组中为 73 例中的 37 例(51%,P=0.071)。在 CombGC 治疗期间,4 例(6%)患者 GO 恶化,在 IVGC 治疗期间,9 例(12%)患者恶化(P=0.214)。6 个月后,在 IVGC 组中,37 例中有 10 例(26%)GO 复发,而 CombGC 组中无一例复发(P<0.001)。在 CombGC 组中,副作用明显多于 IVGC 组(66 例中的 49 例,74% vs 74 例中的 28 例,38%,P<0.001)。

结论

我们的数据表明,与 IVGC 治疗相比,CombGC 治疗更有效,复发率显著降低,但副作用更多。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验