• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会网络与延伸服务对农民采纳农业技术的影响

Social network and extension service in farmers' agricultural technology adoption efficiency.

机构信息

College of Agricultural and Life Science, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX, United States of America.

College of Economics, Xi'an University of Finance and Economics, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Jul 10;15(7):e0235927. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235927. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0235927
PMID:32649684
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7351193/
Abstract

The purpose of the article is to analyze the interaction effect between social network and extension service in farmers' agricultural technology adoption efficiency (TAE). The empirical analysis refers to samples of farmers' water-saving irrigation technology (WSIT) adoption from Minqin, China. The result indicates that social network and extension service can improve farmers' TAE, but they are found to be competitive from the perspective of overall social network. While from the perspective of four dimensions of social network, interaction and trust have positive effects on farmers' TAE, and learning and trust are found to be competitive with extension service. The policy implication describes as follows. First, government should pay attention to farmers' social learning and demonstration effect. And series of measures should be taken to cultivate farmers' social network. Second, extension service should be improved to satisfy farmers' multiple demand on agricultural technology. Third, government should combine the effects of social network and extension service, and make different promotion strategies for different regions. In addition, other influential factors cannot be ignored.

摘要

本文旨在分析社会网络和推广服务对农民农业技术采用效率(TAE)的交互效应。实证分析以中国民勤农民节水灌溉技术(WSIT)采用为例。结果表明,社会网络和推广服务可以提高农民的 TAE,但从整体社会网络的角度来看,它们是相互竞争的。而从社会网络的四个维度来看,互动和信任对农民的 TAE 有积极影响,学习和信任与推广服务存在竞争关系。政策建议如下。首先,政府应重视农民的社会学习和示范效应,采取一系列措施培育农民的社会网络。其次,要改进推广服务,满足农民对农业技术的多元化需求。第三,政府应结合社会网络和推广服务的效果,针对不同地区制定不同的推广策略。此外,还不能忽视其他影响因素。

相似文献

1
Social network and extension service in farmers' agricultural technology adoption efficiency.社会网络与延伸服务对农民采纳农业技术的影响
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 10;15(7):e0235927. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235927. eCollection 2020.
2
What Influences Farmers' Adoption of Soil Testing and Formulated Fertilization Technology in Black Soil Areas? An Empirical Analysis Based on Logistic-ISM Model.什么因素影响了黑土区农民对测土配方施肥技术的采用?基于 Logistic-ISM 模型的实证分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 25;19(23):15682. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315682.
3
[Impacts of policy cognition on low-carbon agricultural technology adoption of farmers.].政策认知对农户低碳农业技术采用的影响。
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2021 Apr;32(4):1373-1382. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202104.024.
4
Impact of social networks on fertilizer use efficiency in China: Evidence from kiwifruit production in Shaanxi province.社交媒体对中国肥料利用效率的影响:来自陕西省猕猴桃生产的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Sep;30(45):101841-101857. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29508-3. Epub 2023 Sep 2.
5
Do market pressure and social network affect farmers' adoption of low-carbon fertilization practices? Evidence from China.市场压力和社会网络是否会影响农民采用低碳施肥措施?来自中国的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(18):51804-51815. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25664-8. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
6
Influence of Smartphone-Based Digital Extension Service on Farmers' Sustainable Agricultural Technology Adoption in China.基于智能手机的数字延伸服务对中国农民可持续农业技术采用的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 5;19(15):9639. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159639.
7
Biopesticides extension and rice farmers' adoption behavior: a survey from Rural Hubei Province, China.生物农药推广与稻农采用行为:来自中国湖北农村的调查。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jul;29(34):51744-51757. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19345-1. Epub 2022 Mar 6.
8
The role of social network embeddedness and collective efficacy in encouraging farmers' participation in water environmental management.社会网络嵌入和集体效能在鼓励农民参与水环境管理中的作用。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Aug 15;340:117959. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117959. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
9
Perceived Value, Government Regulations, and Farmers' Agricultural Green Production Technology Adoption: Evidence from China's Yellow River Basin.感知价值、政府规制与农户农业绿色生产技术采用——来自黄河流域的证据
Environ Manage. 2024 Mar;73(3):509-531. doi: 10.1007/s00267-023-01893-y. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
10
Who cares what parents think or do? Observational learning and experience-based learning through communication in rice farmers' willingness to adopt sustainable agricultural technologies in Hubei Province, China.谁在乎父母的想法和做法呢?在中国湖北省,通过农民之间的交流进行观察学习和基于经验的学习,可以提高农民采用可持续农业技术的意愿。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Apr;26(12):12522-12536. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04609-0. Epub 2019 Mar 8.

引用本文的文献

1
How does livelihood capital influence the green production behaviors among professional grain farmers cultivating high-quality rice?生计资本如何影响种植优质水稻的专业粮农的绿色生产行为?
Front Nutr. 2025 May 26;12:1555488. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1555488. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluating logistic regression and geographically weighted logistic regression models for predicting orange-fleshed sweet potato adoption intention in Benin.评估逻辑回归模型和地理加权逻辑回归模型以预测贝宁橙色肉甘薯的采用意愿
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 15;15(1):8927. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85173-1.
3
Social network effect on land transfer willingness of the rural elders: Evidence from China.社会网络对农村老年人土地流转意愿的影响:来自中国的证据。
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 19;10(15):e34966. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34966. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.
4
The effect of producer groups on the productivity and technical efficiency of smallholder cocoa farmers in Ghana.生产者组织对加纳小农可可种植者生产力和技术效率的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 11;18(12):e0294716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294716. eCollection 2023.
5
Study on the influence mechanism of adoption of smart agriculture technology behavior.采用智能农业技术行为的影响机制研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 26;13(1):8554. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35091-x.
6
What Influences Farmers' Adoption of Soil Testing and Formulated Fertilization Technology in Black Soil Areas? An Empirical Analysis Based on Logistic-ISM Model.什么因素影响了黑土区农民对测土配方施肥技术的采用?基于 Logistic-ISM 模型的实证分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 25;19(23):15682. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315682.
7
Grower decision-making factors in adoption of specialty cultivars: A case study of potatoes in the San Luis Valley.种植者采用特色品种的决策因素:以圣路易斯谷的土豆为例。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 30;17(6):e0270636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270636. eCollection 2022.
8
Farmer social networks: The role of advice ties and organizational leadership in agroforestry adoption.农民社交网络:建议关系和组织领导力在农林复合经营采用中的作用。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 10;16(8):e0255987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255987. eCollection 2021.
9
Overcoming Barriers to Agriculture Green Technology Diffusion through Stakeholders in China: A Social Network Analysis.通过中国利益相关者克服农业绿色技术推广的障碍:社会网络分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 24;17(19):6976. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17196976.