Burck G, Hentschel R, Wiedemann D, Henssge R
Abteilung für Kardiologie, Medizinischen Akademie Carl Gustav Carus Dresden.
Z Gesamte Inn Med. 1988 Oct 15;43(20):572-6.
47 patients with cardiac pacemakers of the MCP- and LCP-series were examined for influence by disturbances caused by devices of electrodiagnostics and electrotherapy used in the GDR. A general prohibition of such diagnostic and therapeutic methods cannot be maintained. Low frequency current therapy (apart from TENS-currents), hydrogalvanic baths and ultrasonic therapy could be applied without any danger. In the CP-current should be guaranteed a minimum distance of 50 cm, when it fell short of, however, only insignificant disturbances appeared. The same concerns the microwave therapy. Also electrodiagnostics was possible without endangering the pacemaker-patient. TENS-currents caused, depending on distance and frequency, no disturbances or dangerous ones (total inhibition). Short-wave repeatedly led to total inhibition or warming at the cardiac pacemaker and should therefore generally be forbidden.
对47名植入MCP系列和LCP系列心脏起搏器的患者进行了检查，以评估民主德国使用的电诊断和电治疗设备所产生的干扰的影响。不能一概禁止此类诊断和治疗方法。低频电流疗法（除经皮电刺激神经疗法电流外）、直流电水浴疗法和超声波疗法可以安全使用。对于电容耦合电流，应确保至少50厘米的距离，然而，当距离不足时，只会出现轻微干扰。微波疗法也是如此。进行电诊断也不会危及佩戴起搏器的患者。经皮电刺激神经疗法电流根据距离和频率，不会产生干扰或危险干扰（完全抑制）。短波反复导致心脏起搏器完全抑制或发热，因此一般应禁止使用。
