End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium; St. George's University, Bioethics Department, St. George's Grenada.
End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Dec;60(6):1170-1180. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.06.029. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
Empirical information on circumstances of dying from advanced illness in developing countries remains sparse. Evidence indicates that out-of-hospital end-of-life care can have significant benefits such as increased satisfaction for the patient and caregivers and cost-effective for a health-care system. Services that are aimed to deliver care at private homes may be a good model for low- and middle-income countries or other low-resourced settings.
To examine specialized, generalist, and informal palliative care provision and to describe the end-of-life care goals and treatments received.
A mortality follow-back study with data obtained from general practitioners certifying a random sample of death certificates of adult decedents who died between March and August 2018. The questionnaire inquired about the characteristics of care and treatment preceding death.
Three hundred nine questionnaires were mailed, and the response rate was 31% (N = 96), of which 76% were nonsudden deaths. Of these cases, 27.4% received no palliative care, 39.7% received it from a general practitioner, and 6.8% from a specialized palliative care service. Comfort maximization (60.3%) was the main goal of care in the last week of life, and analgesics (53.4%) were the predominant treatment for achieving this goal. In addition, 60.3% received informal palliative care from a family member.
The largest part of end-of-life care at home in Trinidad and Tobago is provided by family members, whereas professional caregivers feature less prominently. To ensure quality in end-of-life care, better access to analgesics is needed, and adequate support and education for family members as well as general practitioners are highly recommended.
发展中国家有关晚期疾病患者死亡情况的经验信息仍然很少。有证据表明,院外临终关怀可以带来显著的益处,例如增加患者和护理人员的满意度,并使医疗保健系统具有成本效益。旨在为私人家庭提供护理服务的模式可能是中低收入国家或其他资源有限环境的良好模式。
检查专门的、通科的和非正规的姑息治疗服务,并描述临终关怀的目标和所接受的治疗。
一项死亡率随访研究,数据来自于为 2018 年 3 月至 8 月期间死亡的成年死者的随机死亡证明样本进行认证的全科医生。调查问卷询问了死亡前护理和治疗的特征。
寄出了 309 份问卷,回复率为 31%(N=96),其中 76%是非突发性死亡。在这些病例中,27.4%没有接受姑息治疗,39.7%接受全科医生的姑息治疗,6.8%接受专门的姑息治疗服务。在生命的最后一周,最大程度地缓解不适(60.3%)是护理的主要目标,而镇痛药(53.4%)是实现这一目标的主要治疗方法。此外,60.3%接受了来自家庭成员的非正规姑息治疗。
特立尼达和多巴哥家庭在很大程度上提供了临终关怀,而专业护理人员的作用则不那么突出。为了确保临终关怀的质量,需要更好地获得镇痛药,并强烈建议为家庭成员和全科医生提供充分的支持和教育。