Suppr超能文献

在综合和专科姑息治疗服务的交叉点上遇到的困难:新西兰对在家中接受姑息治疗的丧亲家属的经验的横断面研究。

Difficulties in navigating the intersection of generalist and specialist palliative care services: A cross-sectional study of bereaved family's experiences of care at home in New Zealand.

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Jan;30(1):133-141. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13381. Epub 2021 Apr 24.

Abstract

A generalist-specialist model of palliative care is well established as a framework for the provision of community care in resource-rich countries. However, evidence is lacking regarding how the model is experienced by family carers and the extent to which access to both generalist and specialist palliative care is equitable. A cross-sectional postal survey was undertaken to explore bereaved family's experiences of generalist palliative care and its intersection with hospice services in the last 3 months of life. A modified version of the Views of Informal Carers-Evaluation of Services survey was sent to 4,778 bereaved family. Data were collected between February 2017 and October 2018. Chi-square was utilised to identify factors that impacted on experiences of generalist palliative care; analysis of free text data comprising 45,823 words was undertaken using a directed content analysis approach. Eight hundred and twenty-six questionnaires were returned (response rate = 21%). Seventy per cent of people (n = 579) spent some time at home in the last 3 months prior to death. People who received support from hospice were more likely to receive support from multiple other services. Those who received no community services were less likely to feel supported by their general practitioner, less likely to spend the last 2 days of life or die at home. Feeling supported had a strong association with services working well together, being involved in decision-making and being aware of the poor prognosis. The provision of palliative care is complicated by a lack of integration with specialist palliative care and may be the basis of continuing inequities in the provision of community care at the end of life. The assumption at a policy level that "generalists" are willing and able to play a key role in palliative care provision needs to be further challenged.

摘要

姑息治疗的通才-专才模式是资源丰富国家提供社区护理的既定框架。然而,缺乏关于家庭照顾者如何体验该模式以及获得通才和专科姑息治疗的机会在多大程度上公平的证据。进行了一项横断面邮寄调查,以探讨丧亲家庭在生命的最后 3 个月中对通才姑息治疗的体验及其与临终关怀服务的交叉情况。向 4778 名丧亲家庭发送了经过修改的非正式照顾者意见评估服务调查的修订版。数据收集于 2017 年 2 月至 2018 年 10 月之间。利用卡方检验确定影响通才姑息治疗体验的因素;对包含 45823 个单词的自由文本数据进行了分析,使用的是定向内容分析方法。共收回 826 份问卷(回复率为 21%)。70%的人(n=579)在死亡前的最后 3 个月中有一段时间在家中度过。接受临终关怀支持的人更有可能获得其他多项服务的支持。那些没有接受社区服务的人不太可能得到他们的全科医生的支持,不太可能在生命的最后 2 天或在家中死亡。得到支持与服务良好合作、参与决策以及了解预后不良有很强的关联。姑息治疗的提供因缺乏与专科姑息治疗的整合而变得复杂,并且可能是在生命结束时提供社区护理方面持续存在不公平的基础。在政策层面上,假设“通才”愿意并且能够在姑息治疗提供方面发挥关键作用,这一假设需要进一步受到挑战。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验