Suppr超能文献

排除 24 小时内的蛛网膜下腔出血:腰穿还是不腰穿?

Excluding subarachnoid haemorrhage within 24 hours: to LP or not to LP?

机构信息

Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, QMC Campus, Nottingham, UK.

Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Campus, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

Br J Neurosurg. 2021 Apr;35(2):203-208. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2020.1781055. Epub 2020 Jul 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) is a potentially life-threatening cause of acute headache. Current conventional practice in the United Kingdom (UK) is for head computed tomography (CT) followed by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) xanthochromia analysis if the head CT is normal. However, with increasing radiological accuracy, head CT alone may be sufficient to exclude SAH without requiring CSF xanthochromia for confirmation. This study aims to determine whether CSF xanthochromia is still required to confirm exclusion of SAH after normal head CT within a tertiary referral centre.

METHODS

Data was obtained from Nottingham University Hospitals (NUH) NHS Trust databases on 999 patients presenting with symptoms suspicious of SAH from 2012 to 2015. All patients had CSF xanthochromia analysis when head CT was normal or inconclusive for suspected SAH.

RESULTS

A total of 179 patients were diagnosed with SAH (17.9%). 176 patients were diagnosed radiologically and 3 patients required further investigations. The 3 of the 802 patients who underwent lumbar puncture (LP) and were identified as having had SAH presented more than 24 hours after ictus. When stratified according to the time of presentation, a normal CT head was observed in those who presented within 24 hours from ictus (sensitivity of 100% [95% CI 92.5-100] and negative predictive value of 100% [97.2-100]).

CONCLUSION

Within a tertiary referral centre for SAH, a normal head CT has a very high negative predictive value to exclude SAH when carried out within 24 hours from ictus provided a 3rd generation CT scanner is utilised, and the scan is reported by a neuroradiologist. CSF xanthochromia analysis in this cohort may still be indicated in those presenting with a high clinical suspicion of SAH and in hospital settings where neuroradiologists or 3rd generation CT scanners are not easily accessible.

摘要

背景与目的

蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)是一种潜在的危及生命的急性头痛病因。目前,在英国(UK)的常规做法是,如果头部 CT 正常,则进行头部 CT 后进行脑脊液(CSF)变色分析。然而,随着放射学准确性的提高,仅头部 CT 可能足以排除 SAH,而无需 CSF 变色分析来确认。本研究旨在确定在三级转诊中心,头部 CT 正常且无蛛网膜下腔出血时,是否仍需要 CSF 变色分析来确认排除 SAH。

方法

从 2012 年至 2015 年,从诺丁汉大学医院(NUH)NHS 信托基金数据库中获取了 999 名疑似蛛网膜下腔出血症状患者的数据。所有头部 CT 正常或不确定疑似 SAH 的患者均进行 CSF 变色分析。

结果

共诊断出 179 例 SAH(17.9%)。176 例患者经放射学诊断,3 例患者需要进一步检查。在接受腰椎穿刺(LP)的 802 例患者中,有 3 例被诊断为 SAH,其发病时间超过 24 小时。根据发病时间进行分层,在发病 24 小时内的患者中,头部 CT 正常(敏感性为 100%[95%CI 92.5-100],阴性预测值为 100%[97.2-100])。

结论

在三级 SAH 转诊中心,当在发病 24 小时内进行时,利用第三代 CT 扫描仪,由神经放射科医生进行报告,头部 CT 正常具有很高的阴性预测值来排除 SAH。在临床高度怀疑 SAH 且神经放射科医生或第三代 CT 扫描仪不易获得的医院环境中,本队列中 CSF 变色分析可能仍有必要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验