Gillespie Conor S, Hanrahan John Gerrard, Mahdiyar Roxana, Lee Keng Siang, Ashraf Mohammad, Alam Ali M, Ekert Justyna O, Mantle Orla, Williams Simon C, Funnell Jonathan P, Gurusinghe Nihal, Vindlacheruvu Raghu, Whitfield Peter C, Trivedi Rikin A, Helmy Adel, Hutchinson Peter J
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Department of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Brain Spine. 2025 Feb 4;5:104200. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104200. eCollection 2025.
Aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage has a high incidence, and morbidity. It has been suggested that a negative non-contrast CT head can rule out SAH if performed within 6 h of symptom onset.
What is the sensitivity of CT head at ruling out SAH stratified by time-point, and what is the potential impact of omitting Lumbar Puncture (LP) from the diagnostic pathway?
Systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPEROID CRD42022379929). Three databases were searched, and articles published between January 2000-May 2022 included (Search date 27 November 2022). Primary objective was diagnostic accuracy of CT scans for detecting SAH at <6 h from symptom onset, including reported sensitivity, and specificity values.
63 articles were included (38,237 patients, 7673 with SAH). Pooled CT head sensitivity was 0.94 for excluding SAH (22 studies, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.90-0.97). At <6 h, CT head sensitivity was 0.995 (6 studies, 95% CI 0.941-1.000). Most studies (57.1%, n = 36/63) were classified as high risk of bias. If LP was removed from the diagnostic pathway in the UK, assuming an incidence of 4800 SAH per-year, 336 SAH would be missed per-year, 24 per-year if LP was removed for negative CT < 6 h (95% CI 0-278) and 58 per-year if mean sensitivity is used (95% CI 0-240).
CT head appears to be highly sensitive at excluding SAH <6 h from symptom onset. High quality, prospective data is required to further established the utility of early (<6 h) negative CT head. We recommend that if there is strong clinical suspicion of SAH, yet CT head is reported negative <6 h of symptom onset, that a LP be performed.
动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的发病率和致残率都很高。有人提出,如果在症状出现后6小时内进行头颅非增强CT检查,结果为阴性则可排除蛛网膜下腔出血。
按时间点分层,头颅CT排除蛛网膜下腔出血的敏感度如何,以及在诊断流程中省略腰椎穿刺(LP)会有什么潜在影响?
系统评价和荟萃分析(PROSPERO ID CRD42022379929)。检索了三个数据库,并纳入了2000年1月至2022年5月发表的文章(检索日期为2022年11月27日)。主要目标是评估症状出现后<6小时时CT扫描检测蛛网膜下腔出血的诊断准确性,包括报告的敏感度和特异度值。
纳入63篇文章(38237例患者,7673例蛛网膜下腔出血患者)。排除蛛网膜下腔出血的头颅CT合并敏感度为0.94(22项研究,95%置信区间[CI] 0.90 - 0.97)。在<6小时时,头颅CT敏感度为0.995(6项研究,95% CI 0.941 - 1.000)。大多数研究(57.1%,n = 36/63)被归类为高偏倚风险。如果在英国的诊断流程中省略腰椎穿刺,假设每年蛛网膜下腔出血发病率为4800例,每年将漏诊336例蛛网膜下腔出血;如果在CT<6小时为阴性时省略腰椎穿刺,每年漏诊24例(95% CI 0 - 278);如果使用平均敏感度,则每年漏诊58例(95% CI 0 - 240)。
症状出现后<6小时时,头颅CT排除蛛网膜下腔出血似乎具有高度敏感性。需要高质量的前瞻性数据来进一步确定早期(<6小时)头颅CT阴性结果的效用。我们建议,如果临床高度怀疑蛛网膜下腔出血,但症状出现后<6小时的头颅CT报告为阴性,应进行腰椎穿刺。