National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Beijing, P.R. China.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, P.R. China.
Leukemia. 2020 Oct;34(10):2576-2591. doi: 10.1038/s41375-020-0963-1. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
To investigate progression-free survival (PFS) and event-free survival (EFS) as early efficacy endpoints in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), this systematic review included phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs), phase II trials, and retrospective studies in newly diagnosed DLBCL receiving rituximab-containing chemotherapy through databases search up to 2019. Quality control was performed, where studies with high risk of bias were excluded. Prediction models were first established using the RCTs, and then externally validated in the phase II and retrospective populations. Trial-level surrogacy analysis was conducted by correlating the logarithmic (log) hazard ratio (HR) for PFS or EFS and log HR for OS. Correlation analysis at treatment arm-level was performed between 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year PFS or EFS rates and 5-year OS. The correlation was evaluated using the Pearson correlation coefficient r in weighted linear regression, with weight equal to patient size. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the consistency of predictive model by leaving one subgroup of trials out at a time. Twenty-six phase III RCTs, 4 phase II trials and 47 retrospective studies were included. In trial-level surrogacy, PFS (r, 0.772; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.471-0.913) or EFS (r, 0.838; 95% CI, 0.625-0.938) were associated with OS. For rituximab immunochemotherapy treatment arms in RCTs, there was a linear correlation between 1 and 5-year PFS (r, 0.813-0.873) or EFS (r, 0.853-0.931) and 5-year OS. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated reasonable overall consistency. The correlation between PFS and OS was externally validated using independent phase II, and retrospective data (r, 0.795-0.897). We recommend PFS and EFS as earlier efficacy endpoints in patients with DLBCL primarily treated with rituximab-containing immunochemotherapy.
为了研究无进展生存期 (PFS) 和无事件生存期 (EFS) 是否可作为弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤 (DLBCL) 的早期疗效终点,本系统综述纳入了通过数据库检索截止到 2019 年接受含利妥昔单抗化疗的新诊断 DLBCL 的 III 期随机对照试验 (RCT)、II 期试验和回顾性研究。进行了质量控制,排除了高偏倚风险的研究。首先使用 RCT 建立预测模型,然后在 II 期和回顾性人群中进行外部验证。通过相关性分析 PFS 或 EFS 的对数 (log) 风险比 (HR) 与 OS 的 log HR 来进行试验水平的替代分析。在治疗组水平上,通过比较 1 年、2 年、3 年和 5 年 PFS 或 EFS 率与 5 年 OS 率进行相关性分析。采用加权线性回归分析处理治疗臂水平上的相关性,权重等于患者数量。通过每次剔除一个亚组的敏感性分析来评估预测模型的一致性。纳入 26 项 III 期 RCT、4 项 II 期试验和 47 项回顾性研究。在试验水平的替代分析中,PFS(r, 0.772;95%置信区间 [CI], 0.471-0.913) 或 EFS(r, 0.838;95% CI, 0.625-0.938) 与 OS 相关。在 RCT 中,接受利妥昔单抗免疫化疗治疗的臂之间,1 年和 5 年 PFS(r, 0.813-0.873) 或 EFS(r, 0.853-0.931) 与 5 年 OS 之间存在线性相关性。敏感性分析表明总体一致性合理。使用独立的 II 期和回顾性数据对 PFS 和 OS 之间的相关性进行外部验证(r, 0.795-0.897)。我们建议将 PFS 和 EFS 作为接受利妥昔单抗免疫化疗的主要治疗方案的 DLBCL 患者的早期疗效终点。