Suppr超能文献

早产儿气管切开术放置结局的纵向分析。

A Longitudinal Analysis of Outcomes in Tracheostomy Placement Among Preterm Infants.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, U.S.A.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2021 Feb;131(2):417-422. doi: 10.1002/lary.28864. Epub 2020 Jul 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To study a case series of preterm and extremely preterm infants, comparing their decannulation and survival rates after tracheostomy.

METHODS

We performed a single-institution longitudinal study of preterm infants with a tracheostomy. Infants were categorized as premature (born > 28 weeks and < 37 weeks) and extremely premature (born ≤ 28 weeks). Decannulation and survival rates were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Neurocognitive quality of life (QOL) was reported as normal, mild/moderately, and severely impaired. Statistical significance was set at P < .05.

RESULTS

This study included 240 patients. Of those, 111 were premature and 129 were extremely preterm. The median age (interquartile range) at tracheostomy was 4.8 months (0.4). Premature infants were more likely than extremely preterm to have airway obstruction (54% vs. 32%, P < .001); whereas extremely preterm infants were more likely to have bronchopulmonary dysplasia (68% vs. 15%, P < .001) and to be ventilation-dependent (68% vs. 54%, P < .001). The 5-year decannulation rate for premature infants was 46% and for extremely preterm was 64%. The 5-year survival rate post-tracheostomy for preterm was 79% and for extremely preterm was 73%. The log-rank test of equality showed that decannulation and survival were similar (P > .05) for both groups, even after controlling for potentially confounding factors like race, age, gender, birth weight, and age at tracheostomy. For neurocognitive QOL, 47% of patients survived with severely impaired QOL after tracheostomy. Preterm had 56% with severely impaired QOL and extremely preterm had 40% with severely impaired QOL (P = .03).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that the time to decannulation and the likelihood of survival did not vary among premature and extremely premature infants even when controlling for other confounding variables.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3b Laryngoscope, 131:417-422, 2021.

摘要

目的

研究一组早产儿和极早产儿的病例系列,比较他们气管切开后的拔管率和存活率。

方法

我们对接受气管切开术的早产儿进行了单中心纵向研究。婴儿分为早产(出生 > 28 周且 < 37 周)和极早产(出生 ≤ 28 周)。使用 Kaplan-Meier 法确定拔管率和存活率。神经认知生活质量(QOL)报告为正常、轻度/中度和严重受损。统计学意义设定为 P <.05。

结果

本研究纳入 240 例患者。其中 111 例为早产儿,129 例为极早产儿。气管切开术的中位年龄(四分位距)为 4.8 个月(0.4)。与极早产儿相比,早产儿更有可能出现气道阻塞(54%比 32%,P <.001);而极早产儿更有可能患有支气管肺发育不良(68%比 15%,P <.001)和需要呼吸机支持(68%比 54%,P <.001)。早产儿的 5 年拔管率为 46%,极早产儿为 64%。气管切开术后早产儿的 5 年存活率为 79%,极早产儿为 73%。对数秩检验平等显示,即使在控制种族、年龄、性别、出生体重和气管切开术年龄等潜在混杂因素后,两组的拔管率和存活率相似(P >.05)。对于神经认知 QOL,47%的患者在气管切开术后生活质量严重受损。早产儿中有 56%生活质量严重受损,极早产儿中有 40%生活质量严重受损(P = .03)。

结论

本研究表明,即使在控制其他混杂变量的情况下,早产儿和极早产儿的拔管时间和存活率差异无统计学意义。

证据水平

3b 喉镜,131:417-422,2021。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验