• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多学科气道团队组建后小儿气管切开术的结果:一项质量改进计划。

Pediatric Tracheostomy Outcomes After Development of a Multidisciplinary Airway Team: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

作者信息

Chorney Stephen R, Brown Ashley F, Brooks Rebecca L, Bailey Candace, Whitney Cindy, Sewell Ashley, Johnson Romaine F

机构信息

Children's Health Airway Management Program, Department of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Children's Medical Center Dallas, Dallas, Texas, USA.

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.

出版信息

OTO Open. 2021 Sep 30;5(3):2473974X211045615. doi: 10.1177/2473974X211045615. eCollection 2021 Jul-Sep.

DOI:10.1177/2473974X211045615
PMID:34616995
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8488522/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To analyze a multidisciplinary tracheostomy team's effect on length of stay and cost.

METHODS

An airway management program using a balanced scorecard was created to track key performance measures. Interventions included weekly rounding, standardized placement, postoperative care, and caregiver education. Process measures included time to first education, speech-language pathology consultation rates, and pretracheostomy consultations. Outcome measures focused on the total length of stay, 30-day revisit rates after discharge, accidental decannulation rate, and standardized cost. Regression analysis was used to predict the program's effect on length of stay and total cost.

RESULTS

In total, 239 children met inclusion. The mean time to first education class was reduced from 13.7 to 1.9 days ( < .001). The speech-language pathology consultation rate increased from 68% to 95% ( < .001), and the presurgical consultation rate with the tracheostomy team increased from 14% to 93% ( < .001). The length of stay decreased from 133 to 96 days ( = .006). Total costs were lower for short admissions but higher for prolonged admissions. Revisits within 30 days remained stable over time (18%).

DISCUSSION

Establishing a multidisciplinary tracheostomy team results in improvements in quality metrics when caring for children with tracheostomies. Controlling for associated factors showed the mean length of stay decreased significantly in the first full year of program implementation. Cost analysis estimated significant reductions for tracheostomy patients spending less time in the hospital.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

A airway management program can positively affect tracheostomy processes and outcomes.

摘要

目的

分析多学科气管造口术团队对住院时间和费用的影响。

方法

创建了一个使用平衡计分卡的气道管理项目,以跟踪关键绩效指标。干预措施包括每周查房、标准化置管、术后护理和护理人员教育。过程指标包括首次教育时间、言语病理学咨询率和气管造口术前咨询。结果指标侧重于总住院时间、出院后30天复诊率、意外脱管率和标准化费用。采用回归分析来预测该项目对住院时间和总成本的影响。

结果

共有239名儿童符合纳入标准。首次教育课程的平均时间从13.7天减少到1.9天(P<0.001)。言语病理学咨询率从68%提高到95%(P<0.001),气管造口术团队的术前咨询率从14%提高到93%(P<0.001)。住院时间从133天减少到96天(P=0.006)。短期住院的总成本较低,但长期住院的总成本较高。30天内的复诊率随时间保持稳定(18%)。

讨论

建立多学科气管造口术团队可改善气管造口术儿童的护理质量指标。对相关因素进行控制后发现,在项目实施的第一个完整年度,平均住院时间显著缩短。成本分析估计,住院时间较短的气管造口术患者费用大幅降低。

实践意义

气道管理项目可对气管造口术的过程和结果产生积极影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d39/8488522/a2c78a243834/10.1177_2473974X211045615-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d39/8488522/717c2e27be81/10.1177_2473974X211045615-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d39/8488522/a2c78a243834/10.1177_2473974X211045615-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d39/8488522/717c2e27be81/10.1177_2473974X211045615-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d39/8488522/a2c78a243834/10.1177_2473974X211045615-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Pediatric Tracheostomy Outcomes After Development of a Multidisciplinary Airway Team: A Quality Improvement Initiative.多学科气道团队组建后小儿气管切开术的结果:一项质量改进计划。
OTO Open. 2021 Sep 30;5(3):2473974X211045615. doi: 10.1177/2473974X211045615. eCollection 2021 Jul-Sep.
2
A Multidisciplinary Children's Airway Center: Impact on the Care of Patients With Tracheostomy.一个多学科儿童气道中心:对气管造口术患者护理的影响。
Pediatrics. 2016 Feb;137(2):e20150455. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0455. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
3
Association of a Multidisciplinary Care Approach With the Quality of Care After Pediatric Tracheostomy.多学科护理方法与小儿气管造口术后护理质量的关联
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Nov 1;145(11):1035-1042. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.2500.
4
Safety, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness of a multidisciplinary percutaneous tracheostomy program.多学科经皮气管切开术项目的安全性、效率和成本效益。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Jun;40(6):1827-34. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31824e16af.
5
Effectiveness of interprofessional tracheostomy teams: A systematic review.跨专业团队行气管切开术的效果:系统评价。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Oct;32(19-20):6967-6986. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16815. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
6
Multidisciplinary care for tracheostomy patients: a systematic review.气管切开术患者的多学科护理:系统评价。
Crit Care. 2009;13(6):R177. doi: 10.1186/cc8159. Epub 2009 Nov 6.
7
Epidemiology of Pediatric Tracheostomy and Risk Factors for Poor Outcomes: An 11-Year Single-Center Experience.小儿气管切开术的流行病学和不良结局的危险因素:一项 11 年单中心经验。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Jan;162(1):121-128. doi: 10.1177/0194599819887096. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
8
The Trach Trail: A Systems-Based Pathway to Improve Quality of Tracheostomy Care and Interdisciplinary Collaboration.经皮气管切开术路径:改善气管切开护理质量和促进多学科协作的系统方法。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Aug;163(2):232-243. doi: 10.1177/0194599820917427. Epub 2020 May 26.
9
An intensivist-led tracheostomy review team is associated with shorter decannulation time and length of stay: a prospective cohort study.由重症医学专家主导的气管切开术评估团队与更短的拔管时间和住院时间相关:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2008;12(2):R48. doi: 10.1186/cc6864. Epub 2008 Apr 11.
10
Multidisciplinary team approach in the management of tracheostomy patients.多学科团队方法在气管切开术患者管理中的应用。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Oct;147(4):684-91. doi: 10.1177/0194599812449995. Epub 2012 Jun 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Reducing the Morbidity Associated With Incorrect Pediatric Tracheostomy Tube Placement: A Quality Improvement Initiative.降低小儿气管切开插管位置不当相关的发病率:一项质量改进举措。
Cureus. 2025 Apr 2;17(4):e81619. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81619. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Economic Evaluation of Pediatric Tracheostomy: A Cost of Illness Analysis.小儿气管造口术的经济评估:疾病成本分析
OTO Open. 2024 Jan 17;8(1):e108. doi: 10.1002/oto2.108. eCollection 2024 Jan-Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
The Impact of Socioeconomic Disadvantage on Pediatric Tracheostomy Outcomes.社会经济劣势对小儿气管切开术结局的影响。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Nov;131(11):2603-2609. doi: 10.1002/lary.29576. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
2
Perioperative Outcomes After Tracheostomy Placement Among Complex Pediatric Patients.复杂儿科患者气管切开术围手术期结局。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Aug;131(8):E2469-E2474. doi: 10.1002/lary.29402. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
3
The Incidence of Pediatric Tracheostomy and Its Association Among Black Children.儿童气管切开术的发生率及其与黑人儿童的关系。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Jan;164(1):206-211. doi: 10.1177/0194599820947016. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
4
A Longitudinal Analysis of Outcomes in Tracheostomy Placement Among Preterm Infants.早产儿气管切开术放置结局的纵向分析。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Feb;131(2):417-422. doi: 10.1002/lary.28864. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
5
Predictors of Pediatric Tracheostomy Outcomes in the United States.美国小儿气管切开术结局的预测因素。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Sep;163(3):591-599. doi: 10.1177/0194599820917620. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
6
Quantifying the benefits from a care coordination program for tracheostomy placement in neonates.量化新生儿气管切开术护理协调项目的益处。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Jul;134:110025. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110025. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
7
Association of a Multidisciplinary Care Approach With the Quality of Care After Pediatric Tracheostomy.多学科护理方法与小儿气管造口术后护理质量的关联
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Nov 1;145(11):1035-1042. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.2500.
8
Tracheostomy in Extremely Preterm Neonates in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.美国极早产儿行气管切开术:一项横断面分析。
Laryngoscope. 2020 Aug;130(8):2056-2062. doi: 10.1002/lary.28304. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
9
Survival analysis and decannulation outcomes of infants with tracheotomies.气管切开术婴儿的生存分析和拔管结果。
Laryngoscope. 2020 Oct;130(10):2319-2324. doi: 10.1002/lary.28297. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
10
Pediatric tracheostomy: A large single-center experience.小儿气管切开术:一项大型单中心经验。
Laryngoscope. 2020 May;130(5):E375-E380. doi: 10.1002/lary.28160. Epub 2019 Jun 28.