Unit of Social Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Vaccine Studies, Vaccine Institute, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jul 11;20(1):1087. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09184-5.
This national qualitative study explores (1) the experiences, observations, and opinions of health care workers (HCWs) about beliefs, socioeconomic, cultural, and environmental characteristics of parents refusing vaccination and (2) regional differences in the identified risk factors; (3) recommended solutions to improve vaccine acceptance in each of 12 regions in Turkey.
In total, we carried out 14 individual semi-structured in-depth interviews and 10 focus group discussions with 163 HCWs from 36 provinces. A thematic analysis was performed to explore HCWs' observations about the parents' decisions to reject vaccination and possible solutions for vaccine advocacy.
Within the analyzed data framework, vaccine refusal statements could be defined as vaccine safety, the necessity of vaccines, assumptions of freedom of choice, health workers' vaccine hesitancy, lack of information about national vaccination schedule and components, not trusting the health system, anti-vaccine publications in social media and newspapers, and refugees. Suggestions based on the HCWs suggestions can be summarized as interventions including (1) creating visual cards with scientific data on vaccine content and disease prevention and using them in counseling patients, (2) writing the vaccine components in a way understandable to ordinary people, (3) highlighting the national quality control and production in the vaccine box and labels, (4) conducting interviews with community opinion leaders, (5) training anti-vaccine HCWs with insufficient scientific knowledge and (6) reducing the tax of parents whose children are fully and punctually vaccinated.
The solution to vaccine rejection begins with the right approaches to vaccination during pregnancy. Prepared written and visual information notes should present the information as "vaccination acceptance" rather than "vaccination refusal". Further studies on vaccine refusal rates should be carried out in various regions of the world so that region-specific actions are implemented to decrease the anti-vaxxer movement and to prevent an outbreak of infectious diseases.
本全国性定性研究探讨了(1)医护人员(HCWs)对拒绝接种疫苗的父母的信仰、社会经济、文化和环境特征的经验、观察和意见,以及(2)已识别风险因素的区域差异;(3)在土耳其的 12 个地区中,为提高疫苗接种接受率提出了建议解决方案。
共对来自 36 个省的 163 名 HCWs 进行了 14 次个人半结构化深入访谈和 10 次焦点小组讨论。采用主题分析方法来探讨 HCWs 对父母拒绝接种疫苗的决定的观察结果以及疫苗宣传的可能解决方案。
在所分析的数据框架内,疫苗拒绝声明可定义为疫苗安全性、疫苗必要性、选择自由假设、卫生工作者对疫苗的犹豫、缺乏国家疫苗接种计划和组成部分的信息、不相信卫生系统、社交媒体和报纸上的反疫苗出版物、难民。根据 HCWs 的建议,可以总结出以下建议:(1)制作带有疫苗内容和疾病预防的科学数据的视觉卡片,并在为患者咨询时使用它们;(2)用普通人能理解的方式书写疫苗成分;(3)突出疫苗盒和标签上的国家质量控制和生产;(4)对社区意见领袖进行访谈;(5)对科学知识不足的反疫苗 HCWs 进行培训;(6)对按时足额接种疫苗的儿童的父母降低税款。
疫苗接种的正确方法始于怀孕期间的疫苗接种。准备书面和视觉信息笔记时,应将信息呈现为“疫苗接种接受”而不是“疫苗接种拒绝”。应在世界各个地区开展疫苗接种拒绝率的进一步研究,以便实施针对特定区域的行动,减少反疫苗运动,并防止传染病的爆发。