School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Departments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Nov;76(5):609-614. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.05.024. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
Point-of-care ultrasonography allows rapid diagnosis in the emergency department. A previous study found that a low prevalence of emergency medicine clinicians received point-of-care ultrasonography reimbursement in 2012 (0.7%). We determine nationwide point-of-care ultrasonography reimbursement patterns for 4 subsequent years.
We performed a cross-sectional study using 2012 to 2016 data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Fee-for-Service Provider Utilization and Payment Data Part B, defining point-of-care ultrasonographic examinations using Current Procedural Terminology codes. The emergency medicine workforce was defined by emergency medicine, family medicine, internal medicine, critical care, and advanced practice providers who received emergency medicine-specific reimbursements. We compared patterns of point-of-care ultrasonography reimbursement among emergency physicians in 2012 versus 2016 through a 2-sample test of proportions.
In 2012, 342 (0.7% of total) emergency medicine workforce clinicians were reimbursed for diagnostic point-of-care ultrasonography versus 801 (1.3%) in 2016. Emergency physicians represented an increasing proportion of the total workforce, increasing from 86.0% (95% confidence interval 82.3% to 89.6%) in 2012 (N=294) to 94.6% (95% confidence interval 93.1% to 96.2%) in 2016 (N=758). From 2012 to 2016, total point-of-care ultrasonography reimbursements increased from 13,697 to 31,717, with significant growth from echocardiograms (4,127 to 14,978), abdominal examinations (3,682 to 7,140), and thoracic examinations (801 to 5,278).
The proportion of emergency medicine workforce clinicians receiving diagnostic point-of-care ultrasonography reimbursements, as well as the number of point-of-care ultrasonographic studies, more than doubled from 2012 to 2016. Efforts are needed to understand barriers to adoption of point-of-care ultrasonography because only a small proportion of the emergency medicine clinician workforce was reimbursed in any year.
床边超声检查可在急诊科快速诊断。此前的一项研究发现,2012 年急诊医学临床医生接受床边超声检查报销的比例较低(0.7%)。我们确定了随后四年的全国床边超声检查报销模式。
我们使用 2012 年至 2016 年医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心按服务付费者利用和支付数据第二部分的数据进行了一项横断面研究,使用当前程序术语代码定义床边超声检查。急诊医学劳动力由接受急诊医学特定报销的急诊医生、家庭医生、内科医生、重症监护和高级执业医师定义。我们通过 2 个样本比例检验比较了 2012 年和 2016 年急诊医生的床边超声检查报销模式。
2012 年,有 342 名(占总劳动力的 0.7%)急诊医学临床医生因诊断性床边超声检查而获得报销,而 2016 年则有 801 名(1.3%)。急诊医生在总劳动力中的比例不断增加,从 2012 年的 86.0%(95%置信区间 82.3%至 89.6%)(N=294)增加到 2016 年的 94.6%(95%置信区间 93.1%至 96.2%)(N=758)。2012 年至 2016 年,床边超声检查总报销金额从 13697 美元增加到 31717 美元,其中超声心动图(4127 美元至 14978 美元)、腹部检查(3682 美元至 7140 美元)和胸部检查(801 美元至 5278 美元)增长显著。
从 2012 年到 2016 年,接受诊断性床边超声检查报销的急诊医学劳动力临床医生的比例以及床边超声检查的数量增加了一倍以上。需要努力了解采用床边超声检查的障碍,因为在任何一年中,只有一小部分急诊医学临床医生劳动力获得报销。