Femto-ST Institute, UMR 6174 CNRS, Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté, France.
Departamento de Ciencias biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Caldas, Manizales, Colombia.
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2020 Oct;151:106906. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2020.106906. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
For decades coffees were associated with the genus Coffea. In 2011, the closely related genus Psilanthus was subsumed into Coffea. However, results obtained in 2017-based on 28,800 nuclear SNPs-indicated that there is not substantial phylogenetic support for this incorporation. In addition, a recent study of 16 plastid full-genome sequences highlighted an incongruous placement of Coffea canephora (Robusta coffee) between maternal and nuclear trees. In this study, similar global features of the plastid genomes of Psilanthus and Coffea are observed. In agreement with morphological and physiological traits, the nuclear phylogenetic tree clearly separates Psilanthus from Coffea (with exception to C. rhamnifolia, closer to Psilanthus than to Coffea). In contrast, the maternal molecular tree was incongruent with both morphological and nuclear differentiation, with four main clades observed, two of which include both Psilanthus and Coffea species, and two with either Psilanthus or Coffea species. Interestingly, Coffea and Psilanthus taxa sampled in West and Central Africa are members of the same group. Several mechanisms such as the retention of ancestral polymorphisms due to incomplete lineage sorting, hybridization leading to homoploidy (without chromosome doubling) and alloploidy (for C. arabica) are involved in the evolutionary history of the coffee species. While sharing similar morphological characteristics, the genetic relationships within C. canephora have shown that some populations are well differentiated and genetically isolated. Given the position of its closely-related species, we may also consider C. canephora to be undergoing a long process of speciation with an intermediate step of (sub-)speciation.
几十年来,咖啡一直被归为咖啡属。2011 年,亲缘关系密切的 Psilanthus 属被归入 Coffea 属。然而,2017 年基于 28800 个核 SNP 的研究结果表明,这种合并没有得到充分的系统发育支持。此外,最近对 16 个质体全基因组序列的研究强调了咖啡种(罗布斯塔咖啡)在母系和核树之间的位置不一致。在这项研究中,观察到 Psilanthus 和 Coffea 的质体基因组具有相似的全局特征。与形态和生理特征一致,核系统发育树清楚地将 Psilanthus 与 Coffea 分开(除了 C. rhamnifolia,它更接近 Psilanthus 而不是 Coffea)。相比之下,母系分子树与形态和核分化不一致,观察到四个主要分支,其中两个分支包含 Psilanthus 和 Coffea 物种,两个分支仅包含 Psilanthus 或 Coffea 物种。有趣的是,在西非和中非采样的 Coffea 和 Psilanthus 类群是同一组的成员。几种机制,如由于不完全谱系分选而保留祖先多态性、导致同源多倍体(没有染色体加倍)和异源多倍体(对于 C. arabica)的杂交,都参与了咖啡物种的进化历史。虽然具有相似的形态特征,但 C. canephora 内的遗传关系表明,一些种群具有很好的分化和遗传隔离。考虑到其近缘种的位置,我们也可以认为 C. canephora 正在经历一个长期的物种形成过程,其中有一个(亚)物种形成的中间步骤。