• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开展跨部门合作以应对阿片类药物流行:刑事司法与医疗保健联合举措的范围审查

Developing interagency collaboration to address the opioid epidemic: A scoping review of joint criminal justice and healthcare initiatives.

作者信息

Yatsco Andrea J, Champagne-Langabeer Tiffany, Holder Travis F, Stotts Angela L, Langabeer James R

机构信息

Houston Emergency Opioid Engagement System, The University of Texas Health Science Center, 7000 Fannin Street, Suite 1690, Houston TX 77030, USA.

Houston Emergency Opioid Engagement System, The University of Texas Health Science Center, 7000 Fannin Street, Suite 1690, Houston TX 77030, USA.

出版信息

Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Sep;83:102849. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102849. Epub 2020 Jul 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102849
PMID:32653668
Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the current opioid epidemic impacting well over half of all counties across the United States, initiatives that encourage interagency collaboration between first responder organizations appear necessary to comprehensively address this crisis. Police, fire, and emergency medical services (EMS) are in a unique position to identify substance users and provide necessary resources to initiate treatment, yet there is not sufficient evidence of joint collaborative programs between law enforcement/first responders and healthcare providers.

METHODS

In this scoping review we examine the current state of joint criminal justice and healthcare interventions, specifically, opioid and substance use pre-arrest initiatives via emergency first responders and police officers. We relied on data from the last 10 years across three major databases to assess the extent of criminal justice (CJ) and healthcare collaborations as a response to individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD). We specifically focused on interventional programs between criminal justice first responders (pre-arrest) and healthcare providers where specific outcomes were documented.

RESULTS

We identified only a small number (6) of studies involving interventions that met this criteria, suggesting very limited study of joint interagency collaboration between law enforcement first responders and healthcare providers. Most had small samples, none were in the southern states, and all but one were initiated within the last 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Although studies describing joint efforts of early intercept criminal justice responses and healthcare interventions were few, existing studies suggest that such programs were effective at improving treatment referral and retention outcomes. Greater resources are needed to encourage criminal justice and healthcare collaboration and policies, making it easier to share data, refer patients, and coordinate care for individuals with OUD.

摘要

背景

当前阿片类药物泛滥问题影响了美国超过半数的县,因此,鼓励急救响应组织之间开展跨部门合作的举措对于全面应对这场危机似乎很有必要。警察、消防和紧急医疗服务(EMS)处于识别药物使用者并提供启动治疗所需资源的独特位置,但执法部门/急救人员与医疗保健提供者之间联合协作项目的证据并不充分。

方法

在这项范围综述中,我们研究了刑事司法与医疗保健联合干预的现状,具体而言,是通过急救人员和警察开展的阿片类药物及物质使用的逮捕前干预举措。我们依靠过去10年来自三个主要数据库的数据,来评估刑事司法(CJ)与医疗保健合作在应对阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)个体方面的程度。我们特别关注刑事司法急救人员(逮捕前)与医疗保健提供者之间有具体成果记录的干预项目。

结果

我们仅发现少量(6项)符合此标准的干预研究,这表明执法急救人员与医疗保健提供者之间跨部门联合协作的研究非常有限。大多数研究样本量较小,没有一项在南部各州开展,除一项外,其他所有研究都是在过去5年内启动的。

结论

尽管描述早期拦截刑事司法应对措施与医疗保健干预联合努力的研究很少,但现有研究表明,此类项目在改善治疗转诊和留存结果方面是有效的。需要更多资源来鼓励刑事司法与医疗保健之间的合作及政策制定,以便更轻松地共享数据、转诊患者并协调对患有阿片类药物使用障碍个体的护理。

相似文献

1
Developing interagency collaboration to address the opioid epidemic: A scoping review of joint criminal justice and healthcare initiatives.开展跨部门合作以应对阿片类药物流行:刑事司法与医疗保健联合举措的范围审查
Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Sep;83:102849. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102849. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
2
Criminal justice continuum for opioid users at risk of overdose.阿片类药物使用者面临药物过量风险的刑事司法连续统。
Addict Behav. 2018 Nov;86:104-110. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.02.024. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
3
Disparities in Medication Use for Criminal Justice System-Referred Opioid Use Disorder Treatment.刑事司法系统转介的阿片类药物使用障碍治疗中药物使用的差异。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Sep 6;5(9):e242807. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.2807.
4
Alternatives to Arrest for Illicit Opioid Use: A Joint Criminal Justice and Healthcare Treatment Collaboration.非法使用阿片类药物的非逮捕替代方案:刑事司法与医疗保健治疗的联合协作
Subst Abuse. 2020 Aug 31;14:1178221820953390. doi: 10.1177/1178221820953390. eCollection 2020.
5
Interventions for incarcerated adults with opioid use disorder in the United States: A systematic review with a focus on social determinants of health.美国监禁的阿片类药物使用障碍成年患者的干预措施:一项系统评价,重点关注健康的社会决定因素。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 21;15(1):e0227968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227968. eCollection 2020.
6
Justice community opioid innovation network (JCOIN): The TCU research hub.司法社区阿片类药物创新网络(JCOIN):TCU 研究中心。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 Sep;128:108290. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108290. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
7
State criminal justice policy context and opioid agonist treatment delivery among opioid treatment admissions, 2015.2015 年,州刑事司法政策背景与阿片类药物治疗入院者接受阿片类激动剂治疗的情况。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Jan 1;206:107654. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107654. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
8
Opioid Agonist Treatment Recipients within Criminal Justice-Involved Populations.涉及刑事司法人群中的阿片类激动剂治疗接受者。
Subst Use Misuse. 2022;57(5):698-707. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2022.2034869. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
9
EMS Paramedics and Law Enforcement Officers' Experiences with Joint-Response Efforts on Suspected Opioid Overdose Calls: A Qualitative Study.急诊医疗服务护理人员和执法人员在疑似阿片类药物过量呼叫的联合响应工作中的经验:一项定性研究。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct;51(4):482-498. doi: 10.1007/s11414-024-09895-2. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
10
Barriers and facilitators to the use of medication for opioid use disorder within the criminal justice system: Perspectives from clinicians.在刑事司法系统中使用药物治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的障碍和促进因素:临床医生的观点。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2023 Jun;149:209051. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.209051. Epub 2023 Apr 19.

引用本文的文献

1
THE WHO, WHAT, AND HOW OF INTERAGENCY CRIMINAL JUSTICE-BEHAVIORAL HEALTH TEAMS: Developing and Sustaining Collaborations.跨部门刑事司法-行为健康团队的构成、职责与运作方式:建立并维持合作关系
Crim Justice Behav. 2025 Jan;52(1):61-78. doi: 10.1177/00938548241280391. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
2
RREACT: A mobile multidisciplinary response to overdose.RREACT:对药物过量的多学科移动应对措施。
J Community Saf Well Being. 2024;9(1):19-26. doi: 10.35502/jcswb.360. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
3
Linkage facilitation for opioid use disorder in criminal legal system contexts: a primer for researchers, clinicians, and legal practitioners.
刑事法律系统背景下阿片类物质使用障碍的联动促进:研究人员、临床医生和法律从业者入门指南
Health Justice. 2024 Aug 29;12(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40352-024-00291-8.
4
Opioid Misuse and Associated Health Risks among Adults on Probation and Parole: Prevalence and Correlates 2015-2020.2015-2020 年缓刑和假释成年人阿片类药物滥用及相关健康风险:流行率和相关性
Subst Use Misuse. 2024;59(1):20-28. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2023.2257319. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
5
Characteristics of post-overdose outreach programs and municipal-level opioid overdose in Massachusetts.马萨诸塞州过量用药后外展项目及市级阿片类药物过量情况的特征
Int J Drug Policy. 2023 Oct;120:104164. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104164. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
6
Strengthening policies and structures to combat illicit tobacco trade in the Philippines.加强政策和结构,打击菲律宾非法烟草贸易。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 25;11:1089853. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1089853. eCollection 2023.
7
Guiding officers to deflect citizens to treatment: an examination of police department policies in Illinois.引导警官将市民转介至治疗:对伊利诺伊州警察局政策的考察
Health Justice. 2023 Feb 8;11(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40352-023-00207-y.
8
A scoping review of community-based post-opioid overdose intervention programs: implications of program structure and outcomes.基于社区的阿片类药物过量使用后干预项目的范围综述:项目结构与结果的影响
Health Justice. 2023 Jan 28;11(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40352-022-00201-w.
9
A Qualitative Systematic Review of Access to Substance Use Disorder Care in the United States Criminal Justice System.美国刑事司法系统中物质使用障碍治疗的可及性:定性系统评价
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 3;19(19):12647. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912647.
10
A modified Delphi process to identify experts' perceptions of the most beneficial and harmful laws to reduce opioid-related harm.采用改良版 Delphi 法确定专家对减少阿片类药物相关伤害最有益和最有害法律的看法。
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Oct;108:103809. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103809. Epub 2022 Jul 28.