Department of Orthopedics, section of Sports Traumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Department of Orthopedics, H-HiP Research Unit, Horsens Regional Hospital, 8700, Horsens, Denmark.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Apr;29(4):1340-1348. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06135-w. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
As many as 10% of primary hip arthroscopies end up with a revision arthroscopy procedure when treating patients suffering from femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). In general, revision procedures are indicated because of residual impingement, but only a few studies present outcome data from revision hip arthroscopy after failed FAIS surgical treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes after revision hip arthroscopy in a FAIS cohort and compare outcomes with a primary FAIS hip arthroscopy cohort and describe potential causes of failure after the primary hip arthroscopy. It was hypothesized that subjective outcomes improve after revision hip arthroscopy although outcomes were expected to be inferior to primary hip arthroscopic outcomes.
Three-hundred and thirty-one arthroscopic revision hip FAIS patients were included from the Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry (DHAR). Patient-related outcome measures (PROM's), Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Scores (HAGOS), Hip Sports Activity Scale (HSAS), EQ-5D and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain, were assessed in the study cohort prior to the primary procedure and at revision and at follow-up one year after the revision procedure. These data were compared with 4154 primary hip arthroscopic FAIS patients.
One-year after revision surgery, mean follow-up (in months ± SD): 12.3 ± 1.6, significant improvements (p < 0.05) in all PROMs was demonstrated, but FAIS patients in the primary hip arthroscopic cohort demonstrated significantly higher outcomes, in all PROMs, when compared at one-year follow-up. Scar tissue, residual osseous impingement and insufficient healing of the labral repair were reported as the main reasons for revision surgery. The conversion to total hip arthroplasty was low (6.4%).
Revision hip arthroscopy in FAIS patients improves subjective outcomes significantly, although they are poorer than after primary FAIS hip arthroscopy. Main reasons for revision arthroscopy was scar tissue, residual femoroacetabular impingement and insufficient healing of labral repair.
Level III.
在治疗患有股骨髋臼撞击综合征(FAIS)的患者时,多达 10%的初次髋关节镜检查最终需要进行翻修关节镜检查。一般来说,翻修手术是由于残留的撞击,但只有少数研究提供了 FAIS 手术治疗失败后翻修髋关节镜的结果数据。本研究的目的是评估 FAIS 患者中翻修髋关节镜的临床结果,并将结果与原发性 FAIS 髋关节镜检查队列进行比较,并描述原发性髋关节镜检查失败后的潜在原因。假设翻修髋关节镜术后主观结果会改善,尽管结果预计不如原发性髋关节镜结果。
从丹麦髋关节镜登记处(DHAR)中纳入了 331 例 FAIS 髋关节镜翻修患者。在研究队列中,患者相关的结果测量(PROM)、哥本哈根髋关节和腹股沟结局评分(HAGOS)、髋关节运动活动评分(HSAS)、EQ-5D 和数字评定量表(NRS)疼痛,在初次手术前、翻修时和翻修后一年进行评估。这些数据与 4154 例原发性髋关节镜 FAIS 患者进行了比较。
在翻修手术后一年,平均随访(月±SD):12.3±1.6,所有 PROM 均显著改善(p<0.05),但与原发性髋关节镜 FAIS 队列相比,FAIS 患者在一年随访时的所有 PROM 结果均显著更高。报告的翻修手术主要原因是:疤痕组织、残留的骨撞击和盂唇修复的愈合不足。转换为全髋关节置换术的比例较低(6.4%)。
FAIS 患者的髋关节镜翻修显著改善了主观结果,尽管它们不如原发性 FAIS 髋关节镜检查。翻修关节镜的主要原因是疤痕组织、残留的股骨髋臼撞击和盂唇修复的愈合不足。
III 级。