• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

偏头痛的触发因素类型 - 头痛触发敏感性和回避问卷的因子结构及新简式的制定(HTSAQ-SF)。

Types of Triggers in Migraine - Factor Structure of the Headache Triggers Sensitivity and Avoidance Questionnaire and Development of a New Short Form (HTSAQ-SF).

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

Migraine and Headache Clinic Königstein, Königstein, Germany.

出版信息

Headache. 2020 Oct;60(9):1920-1929. doi: 10.1111/head.13896. Epub 2020 Jul 11.

DOI:10.1111/head.13896
PMID:32654136
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the factor structure of the Headache Triggers Sensitivity and Avoidance Questionnaire (HTSAQ) and its German version (HTSAQ-G), in order to identify potential different types of triggers. Furthermore, a short form of the questionnaire was developed.

BACKGROUND

The HTSAQ includes 24 of the most commonly reported headache triggers (eg, stress, odors, lack of sleep). Both the HTSAQ and HTSAQ-G appeared to be reliable and valid measures of sensitivity to and avoidance of headache triggers.

METHODS

In a cross-country collaboration, data from 2 cross-sectional studies including N = 391 individuals diagnosed with migraine from Australia (n = 222) and Germany (n = 169) were analyzed. The factor structure of the questionnaire was examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Finally, a short form of the HTSAQ was constructed and evaluated regarding psychometric properties.

RESULTS

Factor analytic results showed a differentiation between internal and external headache triggers, and different patterns of strategies in coping with triggers. The scales of both the original questionnaire as well as the developed short form showed good reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.76 to 0.96). As expected, negative correlations (r = -0.10 to -0.30, P = .006 to .044) with acceptance of pain were observed. Participants with chronic migraine showed significantly higher triggers sensitivity and avoidance of triggers than those with episodic migraine (t(389) = -9.12, P < .001, Cohens d = 0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

Both the long and short forms of the questionnaire appear to be reliable and valid measures. The development of the short form of the questionnaire simplifies the use of the HTSAQ in clinical practice. Further research should focus on other primary headache disorders, such as tension-type headache or cluster headache.

摘要

目的

检验头痛触发敏感性和回避问卷(HTSAQ)及其德文版(HTSAQ-G)的因子结构,以确定潜在的不同类型的触发因素。此外,还开发了该问卷的简式版本。

背景

HTSAQ 包含 24 种最常见的头痛触发因素(如压力、气味、睡眠不足)。HTSAQ 和 HTSAQ-G 似乎都是测量对头痛触发因素敏感和回避的可靠有效的工具。

方法

在一项跨国合作中,分析了来自澳大利亚(n=222)和德国(n=169)的 2 项横断面研究中 n=391 名偏头痛患者的数据。使用探索性和验证性因子分析来检验问卷的因子结构。最后,构建了 HTSAQ 的简式版本,并评估了其心理测量学特性。

结果

因子分析结果显示,内部和外部头痛触发因素存在差异,应对触发因素的策略也存在不同模式。原始问卷和开发的简式版本的量表均具有良好的信度(Cronbach's α 为 0.76 至 0.96)。如预期的那样,与疼痛接受度呈负相关(r=-0.10 至-0.30,P=0.006 至 0.044)。慢性偏头痛患者的触发敏感性和回避触发因素明显高于发作性偏头痛患者(t(389)=-9.12,P<0.001,Cohens d=0.93)。

结论

问卷的长式和简式版本均具有可靠性和有效性。该问卷简式版本的开发简化了其在临床实践中的应用。未来的研究应关注其他原发性头痛疾病,如紧张型头痛或丛集性头痛。

相似文献

1
Types of Triggers in Migraine - Factor Structure of the Headache Triggers Sensitivity and Avoidance Questionnaire and Development of a New Short Form (HTSAQ-SF).偏头痛的触发因素类型 - 头痛触发敏感性和回避问卷的因子结构及新简式的制定(HTSAQ-SF)。
Headache. 2020 Oct;60(9):1920-1929. doi: 10.1111/head.13896. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
2
The Headache Triggers Sensitivity and Avoidance Questionnaire: Establishing the Psychometric Properties of the Questionnaire.头痛触发因素敏感性与回避问卷:确立该问卷的心理测量学特性
Headache. 2017 Feb;57(2):236-254. doi: 10.1111/head.12940. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
3
German Language Adaptation of the Headache Management Self-Efficacy Scale (HMSE-G) and Development of a New Short Form (HMSE-G-SF).头痛管理自我效能量表(HMSE-G)的德语版本改编及新的简版(HMSE-G-SF)的编制
Headache. 2015 Jul-Aug;55(7):958-72. doi: 10.1111/head.12564. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
4
German language adaptation of the Cogniphobia Scale for Headache Disorders (CS-HD) and development of a new short form (CS-HD-6).头痛障碍认知恐惧症量表(CS-HD)的德文版改编及新简式量表(CS-HD-6)的制定。
Headache. 2024 Jul-Aug;64(7):772-782. doi: 10.1111/head.14735. Epub 2024 May 24.
5
Development and validation of a novel patient-reported outcome measure in people with episodic migraine and chronic migraine: The Activity Impairment in Migraine Diary.开发和验证一种用于偶发性偏头痛和慢性偏头痛患者的新型患者报告结局测量工具:偏头痛活动障碍日记。
Headache. 2022 Jan;62(1):89-105. doi: 10.1111/head.14229. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
6
Reliability and Validity of the Persian HIT-6 Questionnaire in Migraine and Tension-type Headache.波斯语版HIT-6问卷在偏头痛和紧张型头痛中的信度和效度
Pain Pract. 2014 Sep;14(7):625-31. doi: 10.1111/papr.12120. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
7
Reliability and validity of the migraine disability assessment scale among migraine and tension type headache in Iranian patients.偏头痛残疾评估量表在伊朗偏头痛和紧张型头痛患者中的信度和效度
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:978064. doi: 10.1155/2014/978064. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
8
Cross-Sectional Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Headache-Specific Locus of Control Scale in People With Migraine.偏头痛患者头痛特异性控制源量表的心理计量特性的横断面评估。
Headache. 2019 May;59(5):701-714. doi: 10.1111/head.13485. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
9
Triggers of migraine and tension-type headache in China: a clinic-based survey.中国偏头痛和紧张型头痛的触发因素:一项基于临床的调查。
Eur J Neurol. 2013 Apr;20(4):689-96. doi: 10.1111/ene.12039. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
10
Identifying patients who require a change in their current acute migraine treatment: the Migraine Assessment of Current Therapy (Migraine-ACT) questionnaire.识别需要改变当前急性偏头痛治疗方案的患者:当前治疗偏头痛评估(Migraine-ACT)问卷。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Jul;20(7):1125-35. doi: 10.1185/030079904125004079.

引用本文的文献

1
Anxiety Disorders, Anxious Symptomology and Related Behaviors Associated With Migraine: A Narrative Review of Prevalence and Impact.焦虑症、焦虑症状及与偏头痛相关的行为:患病率及影响的叙述性综述
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2025 Jan 29;29(1):40. doi: 10.1007/s11916-024-01312-9.
2
Headache Specialists' Perceptions of the Role of Health Psychologists in Headache Management: A Qualitative Study.头痛专家对健康心理学家在头痛管理中作用的看法:一项定性研究。
Cureus. 2024 Mar 14;16(3):e56175. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56175. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Habitual caffeinated beverage consumption and headaches among adults with episodic migraine: A prospective cohort study.
习惯性含咖啡因饮料消费与发作性偏头痛成人头痛:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Headache. 2024 Mar;64(3):299-305. doi: 10.1111/head.14673. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
4
Is there a causal relationship between stress and migraine? Current evidence and implications for management.压力与偏头痛之间是否存在因果关系?当前的证据及其对管理的影响。
J Headache Pain. 2021 Dec 20;22(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s10194-021-01369-6.