Department of Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Migraine and Headache Clinic Königstein, Königstein, Germany.
Headache. 2020 Oct;60(9):1920-1929. doi: 10.1111/head.13896. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
To examine the factor structure of the Headache Triggers Sensitivity and Avoidance Questionnaire (HTSAQ) and its German version (HTSAQ-G), in order to identify potential different types of triggers. Furthermore, a short form of the questionnaire was developed.
The HTSAQ includes 24 of the most commonly reported headache triggers (eg, stress, odors, lack of sleep). Both the HTSAQ and HTSAQ-G appeared to be reliable and valid measures of sensitivity to and avoidance of headache triggers.
In a cross-country collaboration, data from 2 cross-sectional studies including N = 391 individuals diagnosed with migraine from Australia (n = 222) and Germany (n = 169) were analyzed. The factor structure of the questionnaire was examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Finally, a short form of the HTSAQ was constructed and evaluated regarding psychometric properties.
Factor analytic results showed a differentiation between internal and external headache triggers, and different patterns of strategies in coping with triggers. The scales of both the original questionnaire as well as the developed short form showed good reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.76 to 0.96). As expected, negative correlations (r = -0.10 to -0.30, P = .006 to .044) with acceptance of pain were observed. Participants with chronic migraine showed significantly higher triggers sensitivity and avoidance of triggers than those with episodic migraine (t(389) = -9.12, P < .001, Cohens d = 0.93).
Both the long and short forms of the questionnaire appear to be reliable and valid measures. The development of the short form of the questionnaire simplifies the use of the HTSAQ in clinical practice. Further research should focus on other primary headache disorders, such as tension-type headache or cluster headache.
检验头痛触发敏感性和回避问卷(HTSAQ)及其德文版(HTSAQ-G)的因子结构,以确定潜在的不同类型的触发因素。此外,还开发了该问卷的简式版本。
HTSAQ 包含 24 种最常见的头痛触发因素(如压力、气味、睡眠不足)。HTSAQ 和 HTSAQ-G 似乎都是测量对头痛触发因素敏感和回避的可靠有效的工具。
在一项跨国合作中,分析了来自澳大利亚(n=222)和德国(n=169)的 2 项横断面研究中 n=391 名偏头痛患者的数据。使用探索性和验证性因子分析来检验问卷的因子结构。最后,构建了 HTSAQ 的简式版本,并评估了其心理测量学特性。
因子分析结果显示,内部和外部头痛触发因素存在差异,应对触发因素的策略也存在不同模式。原始问卷和开发的简式版本的量表均具有良好的信度(Cronbach's α 为 0.76 至 0.96)。如预期的那样,与疼痛接受度呈负相关(r=-0.10 至-0.30,P=0.006 至 0.044)。慢性偏头痛患者的触发敏感性和回避触发因素明显高于发作性偏头痛患者(t(389)=-9.12,P<0.001,Cohens d=0.93)。
问卷的长式和简式版本均具有可靠性和有效性。该问卷简式版本的开发简化了其在临床实践中的应用。未来的研究应关注其他原发性头痛疾病,如紧张型头痛或丛集性头痛。