社会经济差异对慢性疼痛患者脊髓刺激疗法利用的影响。

Socioeconomic Disparities in the Utilization of Spinal Cord Stimulation Therapy in Patients with Chronic Pain.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.

Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.

出版信息

Pain Pract. 2021 Jan;21(1):75-82. doi: 10.1111/papr.12936. Epub 2020 Aug 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) therapies are used in the management of patients with complex regional pain syndrome I (CRPS I) and failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). The purpose of this study was to investigate the racial and health insurance inequalities with SCS therapy in patients with chronic pain who had CRPS I and FBSS.

METHODS

Patients with chronic pain who had a discharge diagnosis of FBSS and CRPS I were identified using the National Inpatient Sample database. Our primary outcome was defined as the history of SCS utilization by race/ethnicity, income quartile, and insurance status. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the variables associated with utilization of SCS therapy.

RESULTS

Between 2011 and 2015, 40,858 patients who were hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of FBSS and/or CRPS I were identified. Of these patients, 1,082 (2.7%) had a history of SCS therapy. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that compared to White patients, Black and Hispanic patients had higher odds of having SCS therapy (Black patients: odds ratio [OR] = 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12 to 1.77; P = 0.003; Hispanic patients: OR = 1.41; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.81; P = 0.007). Patients with private insurance had significantly higher odds of having SCS therapy compared with those with Medicare (OR = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.43; P = 0.003). Compared to patients with Medicare, Medicaid patients had lower odds of having SCS therapy (OR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.70; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that socioeconomic disparities may exist in the utilization of SCS among hospitalized patients with CRPS I and FBSS the United States. However, confirming these data from other administrative databases, in the outpatient setting, may shed more insight.

摘要

目的

脊髓刺激(SCS)疗法用于治疗复杂性区域疼痛综合征 I(CRPS I)和失败的腰椎手术综合征(FBSS)患者。本研究的目的是调查慢性疼痛患者中 CRPS I 和 FBSS 患者接受 SCS 治疗的种族和健康保险不平等情况。

方法

使用国家住院患者样本数据库确定有 FBSS 和 CRPS I 出院诊断的慢性疼痛患者。我们的主要结局定义为按种族/民族、收入四分位和保险状况确定的 SCS 使用史。多变量逻辑回归用于确定与 SCS 治疗利用相关的变量。

结果

在 2011 年至 2015 年间,确定了 40858 名因主要诊断为 FBSS 和/或 CRPS I 而住院的患者。这些患者中有 1082 例(2.7%)有 SCS 治疗史。多变量回归分析显示,与白人患者相比,黑人患者和西班牙裔患者接受 SCS 治疗的可能性更高(黑人患者:比值比 [OR] = 1.41;95%置信区间 [CI],1.12 至 1.77;P = 0.003;西班牙裔患者:OR = 1.41;95%CI,1.10 至 1.81;P = 0.007)。与医疗保险相比,拥有私人保险的患者接受 SCS 治疗的可能性显著更高(OR = 1.24;95%CI,1.08 至 1.43;P = 0.003)。与医疗保险患者相比,医疗补助患者接受 SCS 治疗的可能性较低(OR = 0.50;95%CI,0.36 至 0.70;P < 0.001)。

结论

我们的研究表明,在美国,CRPS I 和 FBSS 住院患者接受 SCS 治疗可能存在社会经济差异。然而,从其他管理数据库在门诊环境中确认这些数据可能会提供更深入的了解。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索