Howard Gabriel, Guinand Luis, Xu Eric, Kervyn Alex, Habibi Behnum
Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2025 Jan 30;29(1):42. doi: 10.1007/s11916-024-01315-6.
This study aims to review the societal, economic, and racial factors that impact the usage of spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain. Our working hypothesis is that patients of ethnic minority groups or of lower socioeconomic status (SES) status may have lower implantation rates and usage of spinal cord stimulation (SCS).
Our study sourced publications from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library on December 21st, 2023 for SCS for the purposes of pain management. Articles were excluded from the review if the study was not USA based, did not involve SCS for the purpose of pain or did not allow for the subgroup analysis. There were 1028 reports that resulted after the initial search with 184 duplicates which were removed. Six reports met the inclusion and exclusionary criteria and were included in the review.
Several trends were able to be extrapolated from the pooled reviews. Orhurhu et al. found that Black and Hispanic minorities had a higher utilization rate of SCSs than their White and Asian counterparts in the inpatient setting. Jones and Missios et al. found that in the outpatient setting, White and privately insured patients were more likely to utilize SCS. Ovrom et al. observed an increased cost associated with Hispanic ethnicity and inpatient SCS utilization. Wondwossen et al. found that in the US military system White patients were more likely to receive SCS earlier in their care than Black patients. Labaran et al. concluded the Southern US completed more SCS implants, particularly in White patients with Medicare insurance.
White patients are recipients of SCS earlier and more frequently than minority patients in the outpatient setting. There is mixed evidence regarding inpatient SCS and how household income relates to SCS usage. Insurance type and coverage may be more accurately predictive than simple household income for SCS utilization.
本研究旨在回顾影响脊髓刺激用于慢性疼痛治疗的社会、经济和种族因素。我们的工作假设是,少数族裔或社会经济地位较低的患者可能有较低的脊髓刺激植入率和使用率。
我们的研究于2023年12月21日从PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆获取有关脊髓刺激用于疼痛管理的出版物。如果研究不是基于美国的,不涉及用于疼痛目的的脊髓刺激,或不允许进行亚组分析,则将文章排除在综述之外。初步搜索后有1028篇报告,其中184篇重复报告被删除。6篇报告符合纳入和排除标准并被纳入综述。
从汇总综述中可以推断出几个趋势。奥尔胡鲁等人发现,在住院环境中,黑人和西班牙裔少数族裔的脊髓刺激使用率高于白人和亚裔。琼斯和米西奥斯等人发现,在门诊环境中,白人和有私人保险的患者更有可能使用脊髓刺激。奥夫罗姆等人观察到西班牙裔种族与住院脊髓刺激使用相关的成本增加。翁德沃森等人发现,在美国军事系统中,白人患者比黑人患者更有可能在治疗早期接受脊髓刺激。拉巴兰等人得出结论,美国南部完成的脊髓刺激植入更多,尤其是在有医疗保险的白人患者中。
在门诊环境中,白人患者比少数族裔患者更早、更频繁地接受脊髓刺激。关于住院脊髓刺激以及家庭收入与脊髓刺激使用之间的关系,证据不一。对于脊髓刺激的使用,保险类型和覆盖范围可能比简单的家庭收入更能准确预测。