Suppr超能文献

脊髓刺激治疗的同意书——陷阱与解决方案

Consenting for Spinal Cord Stimulation - the Pitfalls and Solution.

作者信息

Mehta Vivek, Munglani Rajesh, Eyre Giles, Bajaj Gaurav, Abd-Elsayed Alaa, Poply Kavita

机构信息

Barts Health NHS Trust, Pain Research Centre, London, UK.

St Thomas Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2025 Feb 1;29(1):44. doi: 10.1007/s11916-024-01349-w.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the importance of the consenting process for patients undergoing spinal cord stimulation (SCS) therapy and understanding related complications and effects.

RECENT FINDINGS

Litigation for SCS/DRG related complications can be very costly, with the mean average settlement in cases relating to SCS being $303,173 dollars in the USA. According to the US Anaesthesia Closed Claims Project database, 10,546 claims related to pain medicine were made between 1990 and 2013; 43 of which were associated with SCS complications. This article will further explore consenting and complications within the context of SCS. Consenting for SCS is a crucial and very important step which potentially reflect on patients' expectations and outcomes.

摘要

综述目的

探讨脊髓刺激(SCS)治疗患者的知情同意过程的重要性,以及了解相关并发症和影响。

最新发现

与SCS/背根神经节(DRG)相关并发症的诉讼可能成本高昂,在美国,与SCS相关案件的平均和解金额为303,173美元。根据美国麻醉闭合索赔项目数据库,1990年至2013年间提出了10,546项与疼痛医学相关的索赔;其中43项与SCS并发症有关。本文将在SCS的背景下进一步探讨知情同意和并发症。SCS的知情同意是一个关键且非常重要的步骤,可能会影响患者的期望和治疗结果。

相似文献

5
New advancements in spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain management.脊髓刺激在慢性疼痛管理中的新进展。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2017 Dec;30(6):710-717. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000531.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验