From the Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Italy (R.B., O.M., E.C.).
Electrical Engineering Department, University of California, UCLA, Los Angeles (J.Y.).
Hypertension. 2020 Sep;76(3):819-826. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15323. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
The usefulness of β-blockers has been questioned for patients who have hypertension without a prior manifestation of coronary heart disease or heart failure. In addition, sex-based differences in the efficacy of β-blockers for prevention of heart failure during acute myocardial ischemia have never been evaluated. We explored whether the effect of β-blocker therapy varied according to the sex among patients with hypertension who have no prior history of cardiovascular disease. Data were drawn from the ISACS (International Survey of Acute Coronary Syndromes)-Archives. The study population consisted of 13 764 patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes. There were 2590 patients in whom hypertension was treated previously with β-blocker (954 women and 1636 men). Primary outcome measure was the incidence of heart failure according to Killip class classification. Subsidiary analyses were conducted to estimate the association between heart failure and all-cause mortality at 30 days. Outcome rates were assessed using the inverse probability of treatment weighting and logistic regression models. Estimates were compared by test of interaction on the log scale. Among patients taking β-blockers before admission, there was an absolute difference of 4.6% between women and men in the rate of heart failure (Killip ≥2) at hospital presentation (21.3% versus 16.7%; relative risk ratio, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.10-1.65]). On the opposite, the rate of heart failure was approximately similar among women and men who did not receive β-blockers (17.2% versus 16.1%; relative risk ratio, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.97-1.21]). The test of interaction identified a significant (=0.034) association between sex and β-blocker therapy. Heart failure was predictive of mortality at 30-day either in women (odds ratio, 7.54 [95% CI, 5.78-9.83]) or men (odds ratio, 9.62 [95% CI, 7.67-12.07]). In conclusion, β-blockers use may be an acute precipitant of heart failure in new-onset coronary heart disease among women, but not men. Heart failure increases the risk of death. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT04008173.
β受体阻滞剂在没有冠心病或心力衰竭既往表现的高血压患者中的应用价值一直受到质疑。此外,从未评估过性别差异对β受体阻滞剂预防急性心肌缺血期间心力衰竭的疗效。我们探讨了在没有心血管疾病既往史的高血压患者中,β受体阻滞剂治疗的效果是否因性别而异。数据来自 ISACS(国际急性冠状动脉综合征调查)-Archives。研究人群包括 13764 例急性冠状动脉综合征患者。其中 2590 例患者既往接受过β受体阻滞剂治疗(954 例女性和 1636 例男性)。主要观察指标为根据 Killip 分级分类的心力衰竭发生率。进行了亚组分析以估计心力衰竭与 30 天全因死亡率之间的关联。使用逆概率治疗权重和逻辑回归模型评估结果发生率。通过对数尺度上的交互检验比较估计值。在入院前服用β受体阻滞剂的患者中,女性和男性在入院时心力衰竭(Killip≥2)的发生率存在 4.6%的绝对差异(21.3%比 16.7%;相对风险比,1.35[95%CI,1.10-1.65])。相反,未服用β受体阻滞剂的女性和男性心力衰竭的发生率大致相似(17.2%比 16.1%;相对风险比,1.09[95%CI,0.97-1.21])。交互检验确定了性别和β受体阻滞剂治疗之间存在显著关联(=0.034)。心力衰竭无论是在女性(比值比,7.54[95%CI,5.78-9.83])还是男性(比值比,9.62[95%CI,7.67-12.07]),均是 30 天死亡的预测因素。结论:β受体阻滞剂的使用可能是新发冠心病女性中心力衰竭的急性诱发因素,但不是男性。心力衰竭增加死亡风险。注册网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT04008173。