Suppr超能文献

细胞减灭术联合腹腔热灌注化疗中行胰体尾切除术:识别风险并改善患者选择。

Distal pancreatectomy in cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: Identifying risk and improving patient selection.

机构信息

Division of Surgical Oncology, Mount Sinai St. Luke's Roosevelt, USA.

Division of Surgical Oncology, Mount Sinai St. Luke's Roosevelt, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2020 Nov;220(5):1235-1241. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.06.045. Epub 2020 Jul 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) has become a principal tool in the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), but inclusion of pancreatic resection to obtain optimal debulking remains controversial.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 419 patients with PC who underwent CRS/HIPEC. The patients were divided into two cohorts, those with distal pancreatectomy (DP) and those without (NP), and morbidity and survival outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

The DP cohort (n = 37) and the NP cohort (n = 371) had similar clinicopathologic characteristics (age, p = 0.596; gender, p = 0.328; ASA, p = 0.072). Operative time, number of organs resected, and EBL were greater in the DP cohort (<0.0001). A complete cytoreduction was achieved in 90% of the NP cohort versus 69% of the DP cohort (p = 0.0004). Major perioperative morbidity was more common in those with pancreatic resection (41% vs 19%, p = 0.002). However, there was no significant difference in 90-day mortality or overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Achieving complete cytoreduction is critical to improving long term outcomes for patients with PC. Although pancreatic resections are associated with higher morbidity, short-term survival is not impacted adversely. Pancreatic involvement should not be a strict exclusion criterion for CRS/HIPEC, but patients need to be selected carefully, with close attention to disease burden prior to proceeding.

摘要

背景

细胞减灭术联合腹腔热灌注化疗(CRS/HIPEC)已成为腹膜癌转移(PC)治疗的主要手段,但胰腺切除术以达到最佳减瘤效果仍存在争议。

方法

我们对 419 例接受 CRS/HIPEC 治疗的 PC 患者进行了回顾性研究。将患者分为行远端胰腺切除术(DP)组(n=37)和未行胰腺切除术(NP)组(n=371),比较两组患者的发病率和生存结局。

结果

DP 组(n=37)和 NP 组(n=371)的临床病理特征相似(年龄,p=0.596;性别,p=0.328;ASA 分级,p=0.072)。DP 组的手术时间、切除器官数量和术中出血量均大于 NP 组(均<0.0001)。NP 组 90%的患者达到完全肿瘤细胞减灭,而 DP 组为 69%(p=0.0004)。胰腺切除组的主要围手术期并发症更为常见(41% vs 19%,p=0.002)。但两组 90 天死亡率和总生存率无显著差异。

结论

实现完全肿瘤细胞减灭对于改善 PC 患者的长期预后至关重要。尽管胰腺切除术相关的发病率较高,但短期生存未受到不利影响。胰腺受累不应作为 CRS/HIPEC 的严格排除标准,但在进行手术前,需要仔细选择患者,并密切关注疾病负担。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验