• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用潜在变量建模研究复杂结构测量工具的潜在准则效度。

Studying Latent Criterion Validity for Complex Structure Measuring Instruments Using Latent Variable Modeling.

作者信息

Raykov Tenko, Menold Natalja, Marcoulides George A

机构信息

Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.

Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

Educ Psychol Meas. 2018 Oct;78(5):905-917. doi: 10.1177/0013164417698017. Epub 2017 Mar 26.

DOI:10.1177/0013164417698017
PMID:32655175
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7328229/
Abstract

Validity coefficients for multicomponent measuring instruments are known to be affected by measurement error that attenuates them, affects associated standard errors, and influences results of statistical tests with respect to population parameter values. To account for measurement error, a latent variable modeling approach is discussed that allows point and interval estimation of the relationship of an underlying latent factor to a criterion variable in a setting that is more general than the commonly considered homogeneous psychometric test case. The method is particularly helpful in validity studies for scales with a second-order factorial structure, by allowing evaluation of the relationship between the second-order factor and a criterion variable. The procedure is similarly useful in studies of discriminant, convergent, concurrent, and predictive validity of measuring instruments with complex latent structure, and is readily applicable when measuring interrelated traits that share a common variance source. The outlined approach is illustrated using data from an authoritarianism study.

摘要

已知多成分测量工具的效度系数会受到测量误差的影响,测量误差会削弱效度系数,影响相关的标准误差,并影响关于总体参数值的统计检验结果。为了考虑测量误差,本文讨论了一种潜在变量建模方法,该方法允许在比通常考虑的同质心理测量测试案例更一般的环境中,对潜在因素与标准变量之间的关系进行点估计和区间估计。该方法在具有二阶因子结构的量表的效度研究中特别有用,它允许评估二阶因子与标准变量之间的关系。该程序在具有复杂潜在结构的测量工具的判别效度、收敛效度、同时效度和预测效度研究中同样有用,并且在测量具有共同方差源的相关特质时很容易应用。本文使用来自一项威权主义研究的数据说明了所概述的方法。

相似文献

1
Studying Latent Criterion Validity for Complex Structure Measuring Instruments Using Latent Variable Modeling.使用潜在变量建模研究复杂结构测量工具的潜在准则效度。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2018 Oct;78(5):905-917. doi: 10.1177/0013164417698017. Epub 2017 Mar 26.
2
Reliability of Scales With Second-Order Structure: Evaluation of Coefficient Alpha's Population Slippage Using Latent Variable Modeling.具有二阶结构量表的信度:使用潜在变量模型评估系数α的总体偏差
Educ Psychol Meas. 2018 Dec;78(6):1123-1135. doi: 10.1177/0013164417719948. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
3
Do Two or More Multicomponent Instruments Measure the Same Construct? Testing Construct Congruence Using Latent Variable Modeling.两种或更多种多成分工具测量的是同一结构吗?使用潜在变量模型检验结构一致性。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2016 Oct;76(5):873-884. doi: 10.1177/0013164415604705. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
4
Examining Multidimensional Measuring Instruments for Proximity to Unidimensional Structure Using Latent Variable Modeling.使用潜在变量建模检验多维测量工具与单维结构的接近程度。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Apr;81(2):319-339. doi: 10.1177/0013164420940764. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
5
Examining Validity-Related Correlations and Their Differences Under Assumption Violations.检验假设违背情况下与效度相关的相关性及其差异。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2020 Apr;80(2):389-398. doi: 10.1177/0013164418822703. Epub 2019 Jan 13.
6
Evaluation of Measurement Instrument Criterion Validity in Finite Mixture Settings.有限混合模型下测量工具效标效度的评估
Educ Psychol Meas. 2016 Dec;76(6):1026-1044. doi: 10.1177/0013164415613542. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
7
Scale validity evaluation with congeneric measures in hierarchical designs.层次设计中同类型测量的量表有效性评估。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2011 Nov;64(3):427-38. doi: 10.1348/000711009X484286. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
8
Evaluation of Polytomous Item Locations in Multicomponent Measuring Instruments: A Note on a Latent Variable Modeling Procedure.多成分测量仪器中多分类项目位置的评估:关于一种潜在变量建模程序的说明
Educ Psychol Meas. 2023 Jun;83(3):630-641. doi: 10.1177/00131644211072829. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
9
On the Relationship Between Item Stem Formulation and Criterion Validity of Multiple-Component Measuring Instruments.关于多成分测量工具的题目表述与效标效度之间的关系
Educ Psychol Meas. 2022 Apr;82(2):356-375. doi: 10.1177/0013164420988169. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
10
On Studying Common Factor Dominance and Approximate Unidimensionality in Multicomponent Measuring Instruments With Discrete Items.关于研究具有离散项目的多分量测量工具中的共同因素主导性和近似单维性
Educ Psychol Meas. 2018 Jun;78(3):504-516. doi: 10.1177/0013164416678650. Epub 2016 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

1
On the Relationship Between Item Stem Formulation and Criterion Validity of Multiple-Component Measuring Instruments.关于多成分测量工具的题目表述与效标效度之间的关系
Educ Psychol Meas. 2022 Apr;82(2):356-375. doi: 10.1177/0013164420988169. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
2
Reliability of Scales With Second-Order Structure: Evaluation of Coefficient Alpha's Population Slippage Using Latent Variable Modeling.具有二阶结构量表的信度:使用潜在变量模型评估系数α的总体偏差
Educ Psychol Meas. 2018 Dec;78(6):1123-1135. doi: 10.1177/0013164417719948. Epub 2017 Jul 24.

本文引用的文献

1
The Importance of the Assumption of Uncorrelated Errors in Psychometric Theory.心理测量理论中误差不相关假设的重要性。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2015 Aug;75(4):634-647. doi: 10.1177/0013164414548217. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
2
Acquiescence as a source of bias and model and person misfit: a theoretical and empirical analysis.默认作为偏差和模型及人不匹配的来源:理论和实证分析。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2010 May;63(Pt 2):427-48. doi: 10.1348/000711009X470740. Epub 2009 Oct 16.