• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Measurement Instrument Criterion Validity in Finite Mixture Settings.有限混合模型下测量工具效标效度的评估
Educ Psychol Meas. 2016 Dec;76(6):1026-1044. doi: 10.1177/0013164415613542. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
2
Scale Reliability Evaluation With Heterogeneous Populations.异质人群的量表信度评估
Educ Psychol Meas. 2015 Oct;75(5):875-892. doi: 10.1177/0013164414558587. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
3
Multiple-Component Measurement Instruments in Heterogeneous Populations: Is There a Single Coefficient Alpha?异质群体中的多成分测量工具:是否存在单一的α系数?
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Apr;79(2):399-412. doi: 10.1177/0013164417733305. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
4
Studying Latent Criterion Validity for Complex Structure Measuring Instruments Using Latent Variable Modeling.使用潜在变量建模研究复杂结构测量工具的潜在准则效度。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2018 Oct;78(5):905-917. doi: 10.1177/0013164417698017. Epub 2017 Mar 26.
5
On the Relationship Between Item Stem Formulation and Criterion Validity of Multiple-Component Measuring Instruments.关于多成分测量工具的题目表述与效标效度之间的关系
Educ Psychol Meas. 2022 Apr;82(2):356-375. doi: 10.1177/0013164420988169. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
6
Comparison of Criteria for Choosing the Number of Classes in Bayesian Finite Mixture Models.贝叶斯有限混合模型中类别数量选择标准的比较
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 12;12(1):e0168838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168838. eCollection 2017.
7
A Latent Class Approach to Modeling Trajectories of Health Care Cost in Pediatric Cystic Fibrosis.基于潜在类别分析的儿童囊性纤维化患者医疗费用轨迹建模。
Med Decis Making. 2019 Jul;39(5):593-604. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19859875. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
8
Procedures for Analyzing Multidimensional Mixture Data.多维混合数据的分析程序
Educ Psychol Meas. 2023 Dec;83(6):1173-1201. doi: 10.1177/00131644231151470. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
9
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
10
Evaluation of Revision Effect on Criterion Validity of Multiple-Component Measuring Instruments.评估修订对多分量测量工具准则有效性的影响。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2007 Apr-Jun;42(2):415-34. doi: 10.1080/00273170701360779.

引用本文的文献

1
Multiple-Component Measurement Instruments in Heterogeneous Populations: Is There a Single Coefficient Alpha?异质群体中的多成分测量工具:是否存在单一的α系数?
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Apr;79(2):399-412. doi: 10.1177/0013164417733305. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
2
On the Fallibility of Principal Components in Research.论研究中主成分分析的易错性。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2017 Jan;77(1):165-178. doi: 10.1177/0013164416629714. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
3
Examining Trait × Method Interactions Using Mixture Distribution Multitrait-Multimethod Models.使用混合分布多特质-多方法模型检验特质×方法交互作用
Struct Equ Modeling. 2017;24(1):31-51. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2016.1238307. Epub 2016 Oct 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Examining Measurement Invariance and Differential Item Functioning With Discrete Latent Construct Indicators: A Note on a Multiple Testing Procedure.使用离散潜在结构指标检验测量不变性和项目功能差异:关于多重检验程序的一则说明
Educ Psychol Meas. 2018 Apr;78(2):343-352. doi: 10.1177/0013164416670984. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
2
Scale Reliability Evaluation With Heterogeneous Populations.异质人群的量表信度评估
Educ Psychol Meas. 2015 Oct;75(5):875-892. doi: 10.1177/0013164414558587. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
3
On the Relationship Between Maximal Reliability and Maximal Validity of Linear Composites.线性组合的最大信度与最大效度之间的关系
Multivariate Behav Res. 2006 Jun 1;41(2):105-26. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr4102_1.
4
Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models.使用因子混合模型研究群体异质性。
Psychol Methods. 2005 Mar;10(1):21-39. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.10.1.21.

有限混合模型下测量工具效标效度的评估

Evaluation of Measurement Instrument Criterion Validity in Finite Mixture Settings.

作者信息

Raykov Tenko, Marcoulides George A, Li Tenglong

机构信息

Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.

University of California at Santa Barbara, CA, USA.

出版信息

Educ Psychol Meas. 2016 Dec;76(6):1026-1044. doi: 10.1177/0013164415613542. Epub 2015 Nov 2.

DOI:10.1177/0013164415613542
PMID:29795899
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5965604/
Abstract

A method for evaluating the validity of multicomponent measurement instruments in heterogeneous populations is discussed. The procedure can be used for point and interval estimation of criterion validity of linear composites in populations representing mixtures of an unknown number of latent classes. The approach permits also the evaluation of between-class validity differences as well as within-class validity coefficients. The method can similarly be used with known class membership when distinct populations are investigated, their number is known beforehand and membership in them is observed for the studied subjects, as well as in settings where only the number of latent classes is known. The discussed procedure is illustrated with numerical data.

摘要

本文讨论了一种评估异质群体中多组分测量工具有效性的方法。该程序可用于对代表未知数量潜在类混合的群体中线性合成物的标准有效性进行点估计和区间估计。该方法还允许评估类间有效性差异以及类内有效性系数。当研究不同群体时,如果预先知道其数量并且观察到研究对象在这些群体中的成员身份,以及在仅知道潜在类数量的情况下,该方法同样可以用于已知类成员身份的情况。文中用数值数据说明了所讨论的程序。