Suppr超能文献

种族/族裔隔离与健康差异:未来方向与机遇

Racial/ethnic segregation and health disparities: Future directions and opportunities.

作者信息

Yang Tse-Chuan, Park Kiwoong, Matthews Stephen A

机构信息

Department of Sociology, University at Albany, State University of New York, 315 AS, 1400 Washington Avenue, Albany, NY 12222.

Department of Sociology & Criminology, University of Arkansas, 211 Old Main, University of Arkansas Fayetteville, AR 72701.

出版信息

Sociol Compass. 2020 Jun;14(6). doi: 10.1111/soc4.12794. Epub 2020 Apr 5.

Abstract

Health researchers have investigated the association between racial segregation and racial health disparities with multilevel approaches. This study systematically reviews these multilevel studies and identifies broad trends and potential directions for future research on racial segregation and health disparities in the US. After searching databases including CINAHL and MEDLINE, we identified and systematically reviewed 66 articles published between 2003 and 2019 and found four major gaps in racial/ethnic segregation and health disparities: (a) the concept of segregation was rarely operationalized at the neighborhood level, (b) except for the evenness and exposure dimension, other dimensions of segregation are overlooked, (c) little attention was paid to the segregation between whites and non-black minorities, particularly Hispanics and Asians, and (d) mental health outcomes were largely absent. Future directions and opportunities include: First, other segregation dimensions should be explored. Second, the spatial scales for segregation measures should be clarified. Third, the theoretical frameworks for black and non-black minorities should be tested. Fourth, mental health, substance use, and the use of mental health care should be examined. Fifth, the long-term health effect of segregation has to be investigated, and finally, other competing explanations for why segregation matters at the neighborhood level should be answered.

摘要

健康研究人员采用多层次方法研究了种族隔离与种族健康差异之间的关联。本研究系统回顾了这些多层次研究,并确定了美国种族隔离与健康差异未来研究的广泛趋势和潜在方向。在检索包括护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)和医学文献数据库(MEDLINE)在内的数据库后,我们识别并系统回顾了2003年至2019年间发表的66篇文章,发现种族/族裔隔离与健康差异方面存在四个主要差距:(a)隔离概念在社区层面很少得到实施;(b)除了均匀性和暴露维度外,隔离的其他维度被忽视;(c)对白人与非黑人少数群体(特别是西班牙裔和亚裔)之间的隔离关注甚少;(d)心理健康结果基本未被涉及。未来的方向和机会包括:第一,应探索其他隔离维度。第二,应明确隔离措施的空间尺度。第三,应检验针对黑人和非黑人少数群体的理论框架。第四,应研究心理健康、物质使用以及心理保健的使用情况。第五,必须调查隔离对健康的长期影响,最后,应回答关于为什么隔离在社区层面很重要的其他竞争性解释。

相似文献

4
Death by Segregation: Does the Dimension of Racial Segregation Matter?因种族隔离而死亡:种族隔离的程度重要吗?
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 23;10(9):e0138489. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138489. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
The Impacts of Residential Segregation on Obesity.居住隔离对肥胖的影响。
J Phys Act Health. 2018 Nov 1;15(11):834-839. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2017-0352. Epub 2018 Oct 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验