Pratt-Chapman Mandi L, Ward Adam R
Department of Clinical Research and Leadership, GW Cancer Center, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Tropical Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Transgend Health. 2020 Jun 8;5(2):80-85. doi: 10.1089/trgh.2019.0083. eCollection 2020 Jun 1.
This study examined the relationship between clinician recommendation and receipt of cancer screenings among a transgender and gender-nonconforming (TGNC) sample (=58). Respondents self-identified as TGNC, age 40+ years, and residents of the Washington, D.C. area. Odds ratios were calculated to compare provider-recommended with received screenings. An open-text question asked for recommendations to improve screening experiences. Provider recommendations were associated with screenings for breast, colorectal, prostate, lung, and anal cancer. Respondents cited interpersonal skills, affirming language, and clear information as important health care provider characteristics. Participants reported being more likely to be screened if a provider recommended one regardless of evidence from current published guidelines. Gender identity, anatomy, and hormone exposure are critical elements that should be collected in future cancer screening research to build a stronger evidence base for provider recommendations based on population-level and individual-level risks of TGNC people.
本研究调查了一个跨性别和性别不一致(TGNC)样本(n = 58)中临床医生建议与癌症筛查接受情况之间的关系。受访者自我认定为TGNC,年龄在40岁及以上,且居住在华盛顿特区地区。计算优势比以比较医生推荐的筛查与实际接受的筛查。一个开放式问题询问了改善筛查体验的建议。医生的建议与乳腺癌、结直肠癌、前列腺癌、肺癌和肛门癌的筛查相关。受访者指出人际交往能力、肯定性语言和清晰的信息是医疗服务提供者的重要特征。参与者报告称,如果医生推荐,他们更有可能接受筛查,无论当前已发表指南中的证据如何。性别认同、身体结构和激素暴露是未来癌症筛查研究中应收集的关键要素,以便基于TGNC人群的群体水平和个体水平风险,为医生的建议建立更坚实的证据基础。