Kamen Charles, Pratt-Chapman Mandi L, Quinn Gwendolyn P
University of Rochester, Department of Surgery and Wilmot Cancer Institute.
The George Washington University, School of Medicine and Health Sciences and the GW Cancer Center.
Curr Sex Health Rep. 2020 Dec;12(4):320-328. doi: 10.1007/s11930-020-00285-1. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
Until recently, sexual and gender minority (SGM) people have been largely invisible in health care and health services research. However, understanding the needs and experiences of SGM cancer patients is critical to providing high-quality care, including needs and experiences related to sexual health. In this narrative review, we highlight that the literature on sexual health for SGM people with cancer is lacking, summarize existing literature on disparities affecting SGM patients with cancer, and discuss factors associated with these disparities. We conclude with recommendations and suggestions for future research in this area.
Emerging evidence suggests that SGM people are at a higher risk for breast, cervical, endometrial, HPV-related, and lung cancers, as well as poor cancer outcomes, due to behavioral risk factors and health care system factors (e.g. lower access to health care insurance, discrimination in non-affirming care settings, negative health care interactions with providers). Additional research suggests that lack of clear guidelines for cancer screening in SGM patients, particularly for transgender and gender diverse patients, negatively impacts cancer screening uptake among SGM people. A growing number of studies have suggested greater sexual challenges following cancer treatment for sexual minority men with prostate cancer, while other studies highlight positive outcomes for sexual minority women following cancer treatment, such as benefit finding and resilience. Research on transgender and gender diverse patients is lacking.
Collection of sexual orientation and gender identity data across clinical enterprises and population-based surveys, mandatory health care provider training on cultural and clinical competency with SGM patients, and additional research inclusive of and focused on SGM cancer patients are key strategies to advance evidence-based clinical cancer care for diverse SGM populations.
直到最近,性取向和性别少数群体(SGM)在医疗保健和卫生服务研究中基本上都未受到关注。然而,了解SGM癌症患者的需求和经历对于提供高质量的护理至关重要,包括与性健康相关的需求和经历。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们强调了关于SGM癌症患者性健康的文献匮乏,总结了影响SGM癌症患者的差异的现有文献,并讨论了与这些差异相关的因素。我们最后提出了该领域未来研究的建议。
新出现的证据表明,由于行为风险因素和医疗保健系统因素(例如医疗保险获取机会较低、在不认可的护理环境中受到歧视、与医疗服务提供者的负面医疗互动),SGM人群患乳腺癌、宫颈癌、子宫内膜癌、人乳头瘤病毒相关癌症和肺癌的风险更高,癌症预后也较差。更多研究表明,缺乏针对SGM患者,尤其是跨性别和性别多样化患者的明确癌症筛查指南,对SGM人群的癌症筛查接受率产生了负面影响。越来越多的研究表明,前列腺癌的性少数男性在癌症治疗后面临更大的性挑战,而其他研究则强调了性少数女性在癌症治疗后的积极结果,如发现益处和恢复力。关于跨性别和性别多样化患者的研究较少。
在临床机构和基于人群的调查中收集性取向和性别认同数据、对医疗保健提供者进行关于SGM患者的文化和临床能力的强制性培训,以及开展更多涵盖并聚焦于SGM癌症患者的研究,是推进针对不同SGM人群的循证临床癌症护理的关键策略。