Indianapolis, IN, USA.
La Jolla, CA, USA.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Aug;52(4):669-681. doi: 10.1111/apt.15921. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
Direct comparisons are lacking between vedolizumab and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-antagonist therapy in Crohn's disease (CD).
To compare safety and effectiveness of vedolizumab and TNF-antagonist therapy in adult CD patients.
Retrospective observational cohort (May 2014-December 2017) propensity score-weighted comparison of vedolizumab vs TNF-antagonist therapy (infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab) in CD. Propensity scores were weighted for age, prior treatments, disease complications, extent and severity, steroid dependence, and concomitant immunosuppressive drug use. The primary outcome was comparative risk for infections or non-infectious serious adverse events (requiring antibiotics, antivirals, antifungals, hospitalisation, or treatment discontinuation, or resulting in death). Secondary comparative effectiveness outcomes were clinical remission (resolution of CD-related symptoms), steroid-free clinical remission and endoscopic remission (absence of ulcers/erosions).
We included 1266 patients (n = 659 vedolizumab). Rates of non-infectious serious adverse events (odds ratio [OR] 0.072, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.012-0.242), but not serious infections (OR 1.183, 95% CI 0.786-1.795), were significantly lower with vedolizumab vs TNF-antagonist therapy. Safety comparisons for non-infectious serious adverse events remained significant after adjusting for differences in duration of exposure. No significant difference was observed between vedolizumab and TNF-antagonist therapy for clinical remission (hazard ratio [HR] 0.932, 95% CI 0.707-1.228), steroid-free clinical remission (HR 1.250, 95% CI 0.677-2.310) or endoscopic remission (HR 0.827, 95% CI 0.595-1.151). TNF-antagonist therapy was associated with higher treatment persistence compared with vedolizumab.
There was a lower risk of non-infectious serious adverse events, but not serious infections, with vedolizumab vs TNF-antagonist therapy, with no significant difference for achieving disease remission.
在克罗恩病(CD)中,尚缺乏维得利珠单抗与肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)拮抗剂治疗的直接比较。
比较维得利珠单抗与 TNF 拮抗剂治疗成人 CD 患者的安全性和有效性。
2014 年 5 月至 2017 年 12 月,采用回顾性观察队列和倾向评分加权法比较维得利珠单抗与 TNF 拮抗剂(英夫利昔单抗、阿达木单抗、certolizumab)治疗 CD 的情况。采用倾向评分对年龄、既往治疗、疾病并发症、范围和严重程度、皮质类固醇依赖性和同时使用免疫抑制剂进行加权。主要结局是感染或非感染性严重不良事件(需要使用抗生素、抗病毒药、抗真菌药、住院治疗或停药,或导致死亡)的比较风险。次要比较有效性结局为临床缓解(缓解 CD 相关症状)、无皮质类固醇的临床缓解和内镜缓解(无溃疡/糜烂)。
共纳入 1266 例患者(n=659 例维得利珠单抗)。与 TNF 拮抗剂治疗相比,维得利珠单抗治疗的非感染性严重不良事件发生率较低(比值比 [OR]0.072,95%置信区间 [CI]0.012-0.242),但严重感染发生率(OR 1.183,95%CI0.786-1.795)无显著差异。非感染性严重不良事件的安全性比较在调整暴露时间差异后仍然具有统计学意义。维得利珠单抗与 TNF 拮抗剂治疗在临床缓解(风险比 [HR]0.932,95%CI0.707-1.228)、无皮质类固醇的临床缓解(HR1.250,95%CI0.677-2.310)或内镜缓解(HR0.827,95%CI0.595-1.151)方面无显著差异。与维得利珠单抗相比,TNF 拮抗剂治疗的治疗持续时间更长。
与 TNF 拮抗剂治疗相比,维得利珠单抗治疗的非感染性严重不良事件风险较低,但严重感染风险无显著差异,且疾病缓解方面也无显著差异。