Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Lamar University, Beaumont, TX.
Department of Speech and Hearing, School of Allied Health Sciences, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Am J Audiol. 2020 Sep 3;29(3):450-459. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJA-19-00121. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
Objective The objective of the current study was to examine the source, content, understandability, and actionability of hearing loss information on YouTube videos. Method The study used a cross-sectional design. One hundred of the most frequently viewed YouTube videos were identified, and various data were manually coded (i.e., video source, video content, popularity measures such as number of views, likes, and dislikes). In addition, the understandability and actionability of each video were evaluated using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials rating scale. Results Of the 100 most viewed videos, 16 were created by consumers, 62 were professional created, and 22 were media based. Symptoms, causes, and treatment or management of hearing loss were the most frequently discussed content categories, with over 60% of all videos commenting on these areas. The overall understandability and actionability scores for the 100 videos included were 77% and 31%, respectively, indicating adequate understandability and poor actionability. Conclusions The YouTube videos on hearing loss focus on a range of issues. The poor actionability of these videos was a concern, as these videos may not lead to appropriate consumer actions in addressing their hearing loss. Efforts are needed to improve the quality and content of these videos to promote appropriate behavior change.
目的 本研究旨在探讨 YouTube 视频中听力损失信息的来源、内容、可理解性和可操作性。 方法 本研究采用横断面设计。确定了 100 个最常观看的 YouTube 视频,并对各种数据进行了手动编码(即视频来源、视频内容、观看次数、点赞数和差评数等流行度指标)。此外,还使用视听材料患者教育材料评估工具(Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials)的评级量表评估了每个视频的可理解性和可操作性。 结果 在 100 个最常观看的视频中,有 16 个是由消费者制作的,62 个是专业制作的,22 个是媒体制作的。听力损失的症状、原因和治疗或管理是最常讨论的内容类别,超过 60%的视频都对此类内容进行了评论。这 100 个视频的总体可理解性和可操作性评分为 77%和 31%,表明可理解性尚可,但可操作性较差。 结论 关于听力损失的 YouTube 视频涵盖了一系列问题。这些视频的可操作性较差令人担忧,因为这些视频可能无法促使消费者采取适当行动来解决听力损失问题。需要努力提高这些视频的质量和内容,以促进适当的行为改变。